ArticleEye (London, England)2024
Relative foveal dark adaptation: a potential method for assessing macular health.
Article in Eye (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectiveDark adaptation measures photoreceptor recovery following intense light stimulation. Time to recovery reflects retinal function. We describe a novel method of relative foveal dark adaptation using an iPhone. Data from a small number of healthy subjects were studied to assess reproducibility, effects of age, and consider potential clinical utility.
methodsRelative foveal dark adaption was studied in 6 normal subjects across ages from 20 to 81 years and across differing testing conditions. Foveal bleaching is produced by fixating a bright white circle on an iPhone for variable times. After foveal bleaching an annular surround appears to complete a bullseye stimulus with surround initially brighter than centre. As the fovea recovers the centre regains brightness. Relative foveal dark adaptation, the time for the visual anchor to shift from surround to centre, was studied across a range of bleaching times, ages, and testing conditions.
resultsDispersion of dark adaptation times grows with increasing age. Foveal bleaching for 30 s was as effective as longer times. Testing times with a 30 s bleach were less than 1 min. Foveal dark adaptation was reproducible within each subject and was unaffected by ambient room lighting, pupil size, and light attenuation. Repeat, immediately sequential testing was similarly reproducible except after long bleaching.
conclusionsThis method of dark adaptation is intuitive, repeatable, and relatively unaffected by testing condition. Testing times are brief, requiring only an iPhone screen positioned at reading distance. Relative foveal dark adaptation may be a useful tool to assess macular health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.