Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38918538›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Experiment-guided tuning of muscle-tendon parameters to estimate muscle fiber lengths and passive forces.

Israel Luis, Maarten Afschrift, Elena M Gutierrez-Farewik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Israel LuisKTH MoveAbility, Department Engineering Mechanics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Osquars Backe 18, Plan 4, 11428, Stockholm, Sweden. ailp@kth.se.
Maarten AfschriftFaculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Elena M Gutierrez-FarewikKTH MoveAbility, Department Engineering Mechanics, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Osquars Backe 18, Plan 4, 11428, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Stiftelsen Promobilia 18200Vetenskapsrådet 2018-00750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The workflow to simulate motion with recorded data usually starts with selecting a generic musculoskeletal model and scaling it to represent subject-specific characteristics. Simulating muscle dynamics with muscle-tendon parameters computed from existing scaling methods in literature, however, yields some inconsistencies compared to measurable outcomes. For instance, simulating fiber lengths and muscle excitations during walking with linearly scaled parameters does not resemble established patterns in the literature. This study presents a tool that leverages reported in vivo experimental observations to tune muscle-tendon parameters and evaluates their influence in estimating muscle excitations and metabolic costs during walking. From a scaled generic musculoskeletal model, we tuned optimal fiber length, tendon slack length, and tendon stiffness to match reported fiber lengths from ultrasound imaging and muscle passive force-length relationships to match reported in vivo joint moment-angle relationships. With tuned parameters, muscle contracted more isometrically, and soleus's operating range was better estimated than with linearly scaled parameters. Also, with tuned parameters, on/off timing of nearly all muscles' excitations in the model agreed with reported electromyographic signals, and metabolic rate trajectories varied significantly throughout the gait cycle compared to linearly scaled parameters. Our tool, freely available online, can customize muscle-tendon parameters easily and be adapted to incorporate more experimental data.

Indexed as

Muscle Fibers, SkeletalTendonsBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationElectromyographyGaitHumansMaleModels, BiologicalMuscle, SkeletalWalkingMetabolic energy costMuscle fiber lengthMuscle–tendon mechanicsMusculoskeletal parameterScaling method

Identifiers

PMID38918538
PMCPMC11199655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.