Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38918536›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Multistage time-to-event models improve survival inference by partitioning mortality processes of tracked organisms.

Suresh A Sethi, Alex L Koeberle, Anna J Poulton, Daniel W Linden, Duane Diefenbach, Frances E Buderman, Mary Jo Casalena, Kenneth Duren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Suresh A SethiAquatic Research and Environmental Assessment Center, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Brooklyn College, Brooklyn, NY, 11210, USA. suresh.sethi@brooklyn.cuny.edu.
Alex L KoeberleDepartment of Natural Resources and the Environment, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Anna J PoultonCenter for Applied Mathematics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
Daniel W LindenNortheast Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Woods Hole, MA, 02543, USA.
Duane DiefenbachU.S. Geological Survey, Pennsylvania Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Frances E BudermanDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Mary Jo CasalenaPennsylvania Game Commission, Harrisburg, PA, 17110, USA.
Kenneth DurenPennsylvania Game Commission, Harrisburg, PA, 17110, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in tagging technologies are expanding opportunities to estimate survival of fish and wildlife populations. Yet, capture and handling effects could impact survival outcomes and bias inference about natural mortality processes. We developed a multistage time-to-event model that can partition the survival process into sequential phases that reflect the tagged animal experience, including handling and release mortality, post-release recovery mortality, and subsequently, natural mortality. We demonstrate performance of multistage survival models through simulation testing and through fish and bird telemetry case studies. Models are implemented in a Bayesian framework and can accommodate left, right, and interval censorship events. Our results indicate that accurate survival estimates can be achieved with reasonable sample sizes (

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremFishesAnimalsAnimals, WildBirdsTelemetry

Identifiers

PMID38918536
PMCPMC11199507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.