ReviewJournal of human genetics2024
Two-stage strategy using denoising autoencoders for robust reference-free genotype imputation with missing input genotypes.
Review in Journal of human genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- GS-Impute: A neural network framework for accurate imputation of low-density markers in across-population genomic selection.Plant communications · 2026Article
- Advances in haplotype phasing and genotype imputation.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Chimeric reference panels for genomic imputation.Genetics · 2026Article
- BiU-Net: A Biologically Informed U-Net for Genotype Imputation.Research square · 2025Article
- STICI: Split-Transformer with integrated convolutions for genotype imputation.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Widely used genotype imputation methods are based on the Li and Stephens model, which assumes that new haplotypes can be represented by modifying existing haplotypes in a reference panel through mutations and recombinations. These methods use genotypes from SNP arrays as inputs to estimate haplotypes that align with the input genotypes by analyzing recombination patterns within a reference panel, and then infer unobserved variants. While these methods require reference panels in an identifiable form, their public use is limited due to privacy and consent concerns. One strategy to overcome these limitations is to use de-identified haplotype information, such as summary statistics or model parameters. Advances in deep learning (DL) offer the potential to develop imputation methods that use haplotype information in a reference-free manner by handling it as model parameters, while maintaining comparable imputation accuracy to methods based on the Li and Stephens model. Here, we provide a brief introduction to DL-based reference-free genotype imputation methods, including RNN-IMP, developed by our research group. We then evaluate the performance of RNN-IMP against widely-used Li and Stephens model-based imputation methods in terms of accuracy (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.