ArticleScientific reports2024
A retrospective study of deep learning generalization across two centers and multiple models of X-ray devices using COVID-19 chest-X rays.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding and Mitigating Distribution Shifts in Volumetric Lung Nodule CAD Using a 3D Vision-Language Framework.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Interpretable deep learning for rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy diagnosis: a multi-center study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deriving the OTA/AO fracture classification from routinely collected radiology reports using a large language model.OTA international : the open access journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2026Article
- A Verifiable Framework for Brain Tumor Classification: Combining Vision Transformers, Class-Weighted Learning, and SMT-Based Formal Decision Traces.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- FAIR4prep: FAIR clinical informatics data preprocessing in artificial intelligence applications.Scientific data · 2026Article
- PDSXray: A Benchmark Dataset for Pseudocoloring-Driven Domain Adaptation in Security X-ray Inspection.Scientific data · 2026Article
- An ensemble model approach for identifying pulmonary tuberculosis on chest X-ray.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Improving Performance, Robustness, and Fairness of Radiographic AI Models with Finely-Controllable Synthetic Data.Research square · 2025Article
- Quantitative assessment of impact of technical and population-based factors on fairness of AI models for chest X-ray scans.Computers in biology and medicine · 2025Article
- Intelligence Architectures and Machine Learning Applications in Contemporary Spine Care.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Gradual poisoning of a chest x-ray convolutional neural network with an adversarial attack and AI explainability methods.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Generalization of deep learning (DL) algorithms is critical for the secure implementation of computer-aided diagnosis systems in clinical practice. However, broad generalization remains to be a challenge in machine learning. This research aims to identify and study potential factors that can affect the internal validation and generalization of DL networks, namely the institution where the images come from, the image processing applied by the X-ray device, and the type of response function of the X-ray device. For these purposes, a pre-trained convolutional neural network (CNN) (VGG16) was trained three times for classifying COVID-19 and control chest radiographs with the same hyperparameters, but using different combinations of data acquired in two institutions by three different X-ray device manufacturers. Regarding internal validation, the addition of images from an external institution to the training set did not modify the algorithm's internal performance, however, the inclusion of images acquired by a device from a different manufacturer decreased the performance up to 8% (p < 0.05). In contrast, generalization across institutions and X-ray devices with the same type of response function was achieved. Nonetheless, generalization was not observed across devices with different types of response function. This factor was the key impediment to achieving broad generalization in our research, followed by the device's image-processing and the inter-institutional differences, which both reduced generalization performance to 18.9% (p < 0.05), and 9.8% (p < 0.05), respectively. Finally, clustering analysis with features extracted by the CNN was performed, revealing a substantial dependence of feature values extracted by the pre-trained CNN on the X-ray device which acquired the images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.