Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38918474›Full record

ArticleScientific data2024

Machine Learning-Enhanced Extraction of Biomarkers for High-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer from Proteomics Data.

Senuri De Silva, Asfa Alli-Shaik, Jayantha Gunaratne

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Senuri De SilvaInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, 138673, Singapore.
Asfa Alli-ShaikInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, 138673, Singapore.
Jayantha GunaratneInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology (IMCB), Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, 138673, Singapore. jayanthag@imcb.a-star.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0002-5377-6537

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehensive biomedical proteomic datasets are accumulating exponentially, warranting robust analytics to deconvolute them for identifying novel biological insights. Here, we report a strategic machine learning (ML)-based feature extraction workflow that was applied to unveil high-performing protein markers for high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) from publicly available ovarian cancer tissue and serum proteomics datasets. Diagnosis of HGSOC, an aggressive form of ovarian cancer, currently relies on diagnostic methods based on tissue biopsy and/or non-specific biomarkers such as the cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4). Our newly developed ML-based approach enabled the identification of new serum proteomic biomarkers for HGSOC. The performance verification of these marker combinations using two independent cohorts affirmed their outperformance against known biomarkers for ovarian cancer including clinically used serum markers with >97% AUC. Our analysis also added novel biological insights such as enriched cancer-related processes associated with HGSOC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorMachine LearningOvarian NeoplasmsProteomicsCA-125 AntigenCystadenocarcinoma, SerousFemaleHumansWAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2Biomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenWAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2WFDC2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID38918474
PMCPMC11199488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.