Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38918433›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Does immunohistochemical marker conversion affect the prognosis in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

Mehmet Uzun, Elif Atag, Eda Caliskan Yildirim, Murat Keser, Huseyin Salih Semiz, Olcun Umit Unal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mehmet UzunInternal Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey. memed.uzun3846@gmail.com.
Elif AtagInternal Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Eda Caliskan YildirimInternal Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Murat KeserDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.
Huseyin Salih SemizInternal Medicine, Department of Medical Oncology, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Olcun Umit UnalDepartment of Medical Oncology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers such as hormone receptors (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor2 (HER2) may change after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the rates of receptor change after NAC and to evaluate the prognostic impact of change. Patients with breast cancer who received NAC were included in the study. Changes in pathological findings (ER, PR, HER-2, Ki-67, grade) before and after NAC were examined. In addition, the effect of receptor exchange on prognosis was evaluated. Kaplan Meier analysis was used for survival analyses. Study was approved by Ethics Board of Tepecik Training and Research Hospital (Decision number 2021/10-02). We confirm that all methods were performed in accordance with relevant named guidelines and regulations. The study included 203 female patients. When pathological findings before and after NAC were compared, significant regression was found in grade and Ki-67 values (p = 0.003, p < 0.001). ER change rate was 11.8%, PR change rate was 24.6% and HER-2 change rate was 12.5%. No significant correlation was found between ER, PR and HER-2 changes and prognosis. The pathological T stage after NAC being 1 or 2, no lymph nodes detected, and the tumor grade being 1 or 2 were independent variables related to survival (p: 0.002, p: 0.014, p < 0.001). In patients with breast cancer, it would be appropriate to re-evaluate the HER-2 and HR status of the surgical specimen following NAC, especially in initially negative patients. The correlation of receptor discordance with prognosis is not clear and more extensive studies are needed.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesNeoadjuvant TherapyReceptors, ProgesteroneAdultAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateKi-67 AntigenMiddle AgedPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesKi-67 AntigenReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBreast cancerDiscordanceHer-2Hormone receptorPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID38918433
PMCPMC11199517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.