Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38918413›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Distributed transformer for high order epistasis detection in large-scale datasets.

Miguel Graça, Ricardo Nobre, Leonel Sousa, Aleksandar Ilic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Can classical statistics and deep learning converge on explainable, causally driven target discovery?DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miguel Graça *INESC-ID, Instituto Superior Técnico, 1000-029, Lisbon, Portugal. miguel.graca@inesc-id.pt.
Ricardo Nobre *INESC-ID, Instituto Superior Técnico, 1000-029, Lisbon, Portugal.
Leonel Sousa *INESC-ID, Instituto Superior Técnico, 1000-029, Lisbon, Portugal.
Aleksandar Ilic *INESC-ID, Instituto Superior Técnico, 1000-029, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UIDB/50021/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the genetic basis of complex diseases is one of the most important challenges in current precision medicine. To this end, Genome-Wide Association Studies aim to correlate Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) to the presence or absence of certain traits. However, these studies do not consider interactions between several SNPs, known as epistasis, which explain most genetic diseases. Analyzing SNP combinations to detect epistasis is a major computational task, due to the enormous search space. A possible solution is to employ deep learning strategies for genomic prediction, but the lack of explainability derived from the black-box nature of neural networks is a challenge yet to be addressed. Herein, a novel, flexible, portable, and scalable framework for network interpretation based on transformers is proposed to tackle any-order epistasis. The results on various epistasis scenarios show that the proposed framework outperforms state-of-the-art methods for explainability, while being scalable to large datasets and portable to various deep learning accelerators. The proposed framework is validated on three WTCCC datasets, identifying SNPs related to genes known in the literature that have direct relationships with the studied diseases.

Indexed as

Epistasis, GeneticGenome-Wide Association StudyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDeep LearningHumansNeural Networks, ComputerBioinformaticsHigh performance computingMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38918413
PMCPMC11199512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.