Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38918344›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2024

Creating a Home for Timing Researchers: Then, Now, and the Future.

Argiro Vatakis, Sundeep Teki

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Argiro VatakisMultisensory and Temporal Processing Laboratory (MultiTimeLab), Department of Psychology, Panteion University of Social and Political Sciences, Athens, Greece.
Sundeep TekiUniversity College London, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our ability to perceive event duration and order is critical in every aspect of our lives, from everyday tasks like coordinating our limbs to walk safely, to uniquely human activities like planning our children's future. Many theoretical accounts of timing have been proposed to explain the mechanisms underlying our ability to estimate time and unify events in time. Continuous progress is being met in further refining and extending current theories, with the aim not only to advance our understanding of timing and time perception, but also to make timing more accessible and applicable to daily life. For this to be possible, cross-disciplinary thinking is required, which is something one cannot easily attain in a scientific conference, rather it requires a community. Having a community with an interest and/or expertise in timing can allow for cross-fertilization of ideas. This chapter introduced the story of the Timing Research Forum or else TRF.

Indexed as

Time PerceptionHumansResearch PersonnelScientific communityTime perceptionTimingTiming Research Forum

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.