ArticleClinical journal of gastroenterology2024
A case of delayed necrosis of reconstructed colon after esophagectomy.
Article in Clinical journal of gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report a very rare case of delayed necrosis of the reconstructed colon 6 months after esophagectomy.A 67-year-old male patient had undergone esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for esophageal cancer in 2014. Subsequently, total gastrectomy and ileo-colon reconstruction via a retrosternal route was performed for gastric tube cancer in 2022. Six months later, he suffered acute chest pain and came to our hospital. Contrast-enhanced CT showed severe dilation of the reconstructed colon with poor enhancement of the wall opposite mesentery, without arterial obstruction. Endoscopy showed no ischemic changes in the esophago-ileum anastomosis; however, mucosal color change to black was observed in the reconstructed colon. We diagnosed ischemic colitis of the reconstructed colon and started conservative treatment; however, 18 days later, he developed a right pyothorax due to perforation of the reconstructed colon. We performed necrosed colectomy with right chest drainage and cervical esophageal fistula was made. Histopathological examination revealed mucosal detachment, thinning of the muscularis propria, and ghost-like appearance of crypt. If necrosis of the reconstructed colon is suspected in the late postoperative period, endoscopic findings of the colonic mucosa may be useful in determining surgical treatment, even in the absence of arterial blood flow obstruction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38918307What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.