Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38918244›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2024

Exploring mycorrhizal diversity in sympatric mycoheterotrophic plants: a comparative study of Monotropastrum humile var. humile and M. humile var. glaberrimum.

Ren-Cheng Liu, Wan-Rou Lin, Pi-Han Wang

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ren-Cheng LiuDepartment of Life Science, Tunghai University, No. 1727, Sec. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Xitun District, Taichung, 407224, Taiwan.
Wan-Rou LinBioresource Collection and Research Center (BCRC), Food Industry Research and Development Institute (FIRDI), 331 Shih-Pin Road, Hsinchu, 300193, Taiwan. wrl@firdi.org.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8162-1727
Pi-Han WangDepartment of Life Science, Tunghai University, No. 1727, Sec. 4, Taiwan Boulevard, Xitun District, Taichung, 407224, Taiwan. phwang@thu.edu.tw.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 108-2621-B-080-001-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycoheterotrophic plants (MHPs) rely on their mycorrhizal fungus for carbon and nutrient supply, thus a shift in mycobionts may play a crucial role in speciation. This study aims to explore the mycorrhizal diversity of two closely related and sympatric fully MHPs, Monotropastrum humile var. humile (Mhh) and M. humile var. glaberrimum (Mhg), and determine their mycorrhizal associations. A total of 1,108,710 and 1,119,071 ectomycorrhizal fungal reads were obtained from 31 Mhh and 31 Mhg, and these were finally assigned to 227 and 202 operational taxonomic units, respectively. Results show that sympatric Mhh and Mhg are predominantly associated with different fungal genera in Russulaceae. Mhh is consistently associated with members of Russula, whereas Mhg is associated with members of Lactarius. Associating with different mycobionts and limited sharing of fungal partners might reduce the competition and contribute to their coexistence. The ectomycorrhizal fungal communities are significantly different among the five forests in both Mhh and Mhg. The distinct mycorrhizal specificity between Mhh and Mhg suggests the possibility of different mycobionts triggered ecological speciation between sympatric species.

Indexed as

BiodiversityMycorrhizaeAsteraceaePhylogenySoil MicrobiologySympatryCoexisting mycoheterotrophic plantsMonotropastrum humileMycoheterotrophyRussulaceaeSpeciation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.