Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38918189›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2024

[Anatomical study of the limited osteotomy suture button fixation Latarjet procedure with coracoacromial ligament preservation].

Xinzhi Liang, Daqiang Liang, Bing Wu, Jintao Li, Hao Li, Wei Lu, Denghui Xie, Haifeng Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xinzhi LiangDepartment of Sports Medicine, the Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Guangdong, 518025, P. R. China.
Daqiang Liang.
Bing WuDepartment of Sports Medicine, the Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Guangdong, 518025, P. R. China.
Jintao LiDepartment of Orthopedics Medical Center, Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510630, P. R. China.
Hao LiDepartment of Sports Medicine, the Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Guangdong, 518025, P. R. China.
Wei LuDepartment of Sports Medicine, the Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Guangdong, 518025, P. R. China.
Denghui XieDepartment of Orthopedics Medical Center, Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou Guangdong, 510630, P. R. China.
Haifeng LiuDepartment of Sports Medicine, the Second People's Hospital of Shenzhen, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen Guangdong, 518025, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the morphological characteristics of the glenohumeral joint (including the glenoid and coracoid) in the Chinese population and determine the feasibility of designing coracoid osteotomy based on the preoperative glenoid defect arc length by constructing glenoid defect models and simulating suture button fixation Latarjet procedure. Methods: Twelve shoulder joint specimens from 6 adult cadavers donated voluntarily were harvested. First, whether the coracoacromial ligament and conjoint tendon connected was anatomically observed and their intersection point was identified. The vertical distance from the intersection point to the coracoid, the maximum allowable osteotomy length starting from the intersection point, and the maximum osteotomy angle were measured. Next, the anteroinferior glenoid defect models of different degrees were randomly constructed. The arc length and area of the glenoid defect were measured. Based on the arc length of the glenoid defect of the model, the size of coracoid oblique osteotomy was designed and the actual length and angle of the coracoid osteotomy were measured. A limited osteotomy suture button fixation Latarjet procedure with the coracoacromial ligament and pectoralis minor preservation was performed and the position of coracoid block was observed. Results: All shoulder joint specimens exhibited crossing fibers between the coracoacromial ligament and the conjoint tendon. The vertical distance from the tip of the coracoid to the coracoid return point was 24.8-32.2 mm (mean, 28.5 mm). The maximum allowable osteotomy length starting from the intersection point was 26.7-36.9 mm (mean, 32.0 mm). The maximum osteotomy angle was 58.8°-71.9° (mean, 63.5°). Based on the anteroinferior glenoid defect model, the arc length of the glenoid defect was 22.6-29.4 mm (mean, 26.0 mm); the ratio of glenoid defect was 20.8%-26.2% (mean, 23.7%). Based on the coracoid block, the length of the coracoid osteotomy was 23.5-31.4 mm (mean, 26.4 mm); the osteotomy angle was 51.3°-69.2° (mean, 57.1°). There was no significant difference between the arc length of the glenoid defect and the length of the coracoid osteotomy ( Conclusion: The size of the coracoid is generally sufficient to meet the needs of repairing larger glenoid defects. The oblique osteotomy with preserving the coracoacromial ligament may potentially replace the traditional Latarjet osteotomy method.

Indexed as

Ligaments, ArticularOsteotomyShoulder JointAdultFemaleHumansMalePelvic Bonesapplied anatomycoracoacromial ligamentglenoidlimited osteotomySuture button fixation Latarjet procedure

Identifiers

PMID38918189
PMCPMC11190692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.