Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38917426›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2024

All of whom? Limitations encountered using All of Us Researcher Workbench in a Primary Care residents secondary data analysis research training block.

Fred Willie Zametkin LaPolla, Marco Barber Grossi, Sharon Chen, Tai Wei Guo, Kathryn Havranek, Olivia Jebb, Minh Thu Nguyen, Sneha Panganamamula, Noah Smith, Shree Sundaresh and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Fred Willie Zametkin LaPollaNYU Health Sciences Library, NYU Langone Health Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3185-9753
Marco Barber GrossiDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovations, NYU Langone Health Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Sharon ChenDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovations, NYU Langone Health Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Tai Wei GuoDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovations, NYU Langone Health Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Kathryn HavranekDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovations, NYU Langone Health Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Olivia JebbDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovations, NYU Langone Health Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Minh Thu NguyenDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovations, NYU Langone Health Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Sneha PanganamamulaNYU Langone Health Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Noah SmithDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovations, NYU Langone Health Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Shree SundareshDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovations, NYU Langone Health Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Jonathan YuDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovations, NYU Langone Health Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.
Gabrielle MayerDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Clinical Innovations, NYU Langone Health Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe goal of this case report is to detail experiences and challenges experienced in the training of Primary Care residents in secondary analysis using All of Us Researcher Workbench. At our large, urban safety net hospital, Primary Care/Internal Medicine residents in their third year undergo a research intensive block, the Research Practicum, where they work as a team to conduct secondary data analysis on a dataset with faculty facilitation. In 2023, this research block focused on use of the All of Us Researcher Workbench for secondary data analysis. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwo groups of 5 residents underwent training to access the All of Us Researcher Workbench, and each group explored available data with a faculty facilitator and generated original research questions. Two blocks of residents successfully completed their research blocks and created original presentations on "social isolation and A1C" levels and "medical discrimination and diabetes management."

resultsDepartmental faculty were satisfied with the depth of learning and data exploration. In focus groups, some residents noted that for those without interest in performing research, the activity felt extraneous to their career goals, while others were glad for the opportunity to publish. In both blocks, residents highlighted dissatisfaction with the degree to which the All of Us Researcher Workbench was representative of patients they encounter in a large safety net hospital. DISCUSSION: Using the All of Us Researcher Workbench provided residents with an opportunity to explore novel questions in a massive data source. Many residents however noted that because the population described in the All of Us Researcher Workbench appeared to be more highly educated and less racially diverse than patients they encounter in their practice, research may be hard to generalize in a community health context. Additionally, given that the data required knowledge of 1 of 2 code-based data analysis languages (R or Python) and work within an idiosyncratic coding environment, residents were heavily reliant on a faculty facilitator to assist with analysis.

conclusionUsing the All of Us Researcher Workbench for research training allowed residents to explore novel questions and gain first-hand exposure to opportunities and challenges in secondary data analysis.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyPrimary Health CareBiomedical ResearchData AnalysisHumansInternal MedicineSecondary Data AnalysisUnited StatesAll of UsGraduate Medical Educationhealth surveillance dataPrimary Care residentssecondary data analysis

Identifiers

PMID38917426
PMCPMC11631142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.