Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38917409›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024

Document-level biomedical relation extraction via hierarchical tree graph and relation segmentation module.

Jianyuan Yuan, Fengyu Zhang, Yimeng Qiu, Hongfei Lin, Yijia Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jianyuan YuanSchool of Information Science and Technology, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China.
Fengyu ZhangSchool of Information Science and Technology, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China.
Yimeng QiuSchool of Information Science and Technology, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China.
Hongfei LinSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China.
Yijia ZhangSchool of Information Science and Technology, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5843-4675

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of China 62072070
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationBiomedical relation extraction at the document level (Bio-DocRE) involves extracting relation instances from biomedical texts that span multiple sentences, often containing various entity concepts such as genes, diseases, chemicals, variants, etc. Currently, this task is usually implemented based on graphs or transformers. However, most work directly models entity features to relation prediction, ignoring the effectiveness of entity pair information as an intermediate state for relation prediction. In this article, we decouple this task into a three-stage process to capture sufficient information for improving relation prediction.

resultsWe propose an innovative framework HTGRS for Bio-DocRE, which constructs a hierarchical tree graph (HTG) to integrate key information sources in the document, achieving relation reasoning based on entity. In addition, inspired by the idea of semantic segmentation, we conceptualize the task as a table-filling problem and develop a relation segmentation (RS) module to enhance relation reasoning based on the entity pair. Extensive experiments on three datasets show that the proposed framework outperforms the state-of-the-art methods and achieves superior performance. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our source code is available at https://github.com/passengeryjy/HTGRS.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsData MiningComputational BiologyHumansNatural Language ProcessingSemantics

Identifiers

PMID38917409
PMCPMC11629692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.