Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38917363›Full record

ArticleACS applied bio materials2024

Stimuli-Responsive Codelivery System-Embedded Polymeric Nanofibers with Synergistic Effects of Growth Factors and Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound to Enhance Osteogenesis Properties.

Samira Malekmohammadi, Rashid Jamshidi, Joanna M Sadowska, Chen Meng, Chamil Abeykoon, Mohsen Akbari, R Hugh Gong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS applied bio materials, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Samira MalekmohammadiDepartment of Materials, Engineering Building A, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, U.K.
Rashid JamshidiDepartment of Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M1 5GD, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-8407-8005
Joanna M SadowskaAdvanced Materials and Bioengineering Research Centre (AMBER), Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland and Trinity College Dublin, Dublin D02 YN77, Ireland.
Chen MengDepartment of Materials, Engineering Building A, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, U.K.ORCID 0000-0001-5540-553X
Chamil AbeykoonDepartment of Materials, Engineering Building A, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, U.K.ORCID 0000-0002-6797-776X
Mohsen AkbariLaboratory for Innovations in Microengineering (LiME), Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8P 5C2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2902-6557
R Hugh GongDepartment of Materials, Engineering Building A, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, U.K.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present work aims to develop optimized scaffolds for bone repair by incorporating mesoporous nanoparticles into them, thereby combining bioactive factors for cell growth and preventing rapid release or loss of effectiveness. We synthesized biocompatible and biodegradable scaffolds designed for the controlled codelivery of curcumin (CUR) and recombinant human bone morphogenic protein-2 (rhBMP-2). Active agents in dendritic silica/titania mesoporous nanoparticles (DSTNs) were incorporated at different weight percentages (0, 2, 5, 7, 9, and 10 wt %) into a matrix of polycaprolactone (PCL) and polyethylene glycol (PEG) nanofibers, forming the CUR-BMP-2@DSTNs/PCL-PEG delivery system (S0, S2, S5, S7, S9, and S10, respectively, with the number showing the weight percentage). To enhance the formation process, the system was treated using low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS). Different advanced methods were employed to assess the physical, chemical, and mechanical characteristics of the fabricated scaffolds, all confirming that incorporating the nanoparticles improves their mechanical and structural properties. Their hydrophilicity increased by approximately 25%, leading to ca. 53% enhancement in their water absorption capacity. Furthermore, we observed a sustained release of approximately 97% for CUR and 70% for BMP-2 for the S7 (scaffold with 7 wt % DSTNs) over 28 days, which was further enhanced using ultrasound. In vitro studies demonstrated accelerated scaffold biodegradation, with the highest level observed in S7 scaffolds, approximately three times higher than the control group. Moreover, the cell viability and proliferation on DSTNs-containing scaffolds increased when compared to the control group. Overall, our study presents a promising nanocomposite scaffold design with notable improvements in structural, mechanical, and biological properties compared to the control group, along with controlled and sustained drug release capabilities. This makes the scaffold a compelling candidate for advanced bone tissue engineering and regenerative therapies.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBone Morphogenetic Protein 2Materials TestingNanofibersOsteogenesisParticle SizeCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCurcuminHumansPolyestersPolyethylene GlycolsPolymersRecombinant ProteinsTissue ScaffoldsTransforming Growth Factor betaBiocompatible MaterialsBone Morphogenetic Protein 2CurcuminpolycaprolactonePolyestersPolyethylene GlycolsPolymersrecombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2Recombinant ProteinsTransforming Growth Factor betabone tissue regenerationcontrolled releasedendritic silica nanoparticlesdrug deliverylow-intensity pulsed ultrasoundscaffold

Identifiers

PMID38917363
PMCPMC11253091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.