ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2024
A Telemedicine Analytic Framework for Fully and Semi-Automatic Alzheimer's Disease Screening Using Clock Drawing Test.
Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic accuracy of digital clock drawing test for Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
More than 6 million Americans are at risk for Alzheimer's Disease Related Dementias (ADRD), most of whom are 65 or older. The clock drawing test (CDT) is a quick, simple, and effective technique that has the potential advantage of self-management and screening for ADRD patients. Current CDT-based ADRD screening studies focus more on efficacy, involving many handcrafted features, ignoring data modalities, and lacking validation. This paper aims to propose a unified telemedicine framework for fully and semi-automatic effective early ADRD screening based on multimodal and agile data fusion, focusing on the interpretability and validation of the model by using gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) and locally linear embedding (LLE). The datasets for this work include 1,662 samples of CDT images and related demographic and cognitive information. The fully automatic case involving only CDT images can achieve the highest AUC of 81 with a 75 recall rate in binary screening. The multimodal data fusion in the semi-automatic case can achieve up to 90 AUC with an 83 recall rate. The visualization of the Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) shows that it can automatically obtain critical information about the outline, scale, and clock hands from CDT images, and the analysis of structured features shows that the memory test is key to effective ADRD screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.