Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38917231›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Automated monitoring of brush use in dairy cattle.

Negar Sadrzadeh, Borbala Foris, Joseph Krahn, Marina A G von Keyserlingk, Daniel M Weary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Negar SadrzadehAnimal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Borbala ForisAnimal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0901-3057
Joseph KrahnAnimal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1559-1216
Marina A G von KeyserlingkAnimal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1427-3152
Daniel M WearyAnimal Welfare Program, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0917-3982

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Access to brushes allows for natural scratching behaviors in cattle, especially in confined indoor settings. Cattle are motivated to use brushes, but brush use varies with multiple factors including social hierarchy and health. Brush use might serve an indicator of cow health or welfare, but practical application of these measures requires accurate and automated monitoring tools. This study describes a machine learning approach to monitor brush use by dairy cattle. We aimed to capture the daily brush use by integrating data on the rotation of a mechanical brush with data on cow identify derived from either 1) low-frequency radio frequency identification or 2) a computer vision system using fiducial markers. We found that the computer vision system outperformed the RFID system in accuracy, and that the machine learning algorithms enhanced the precision of the brush use estimates. This study presents the first description of a fiducial marker-based computer vision system for monitoring individual cattle behavior in a group setting; this approach could be applied to develop automated measures of other behaviors with the potential to better assess welfare and improve the care for farm animals.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalMachine LearningAlgorithmsAnimalsAnimal WelfareCattleDairyingFemaleRadio Frequency Identification Device

Identifiers

PMID38917231
PMCPMC11198893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.