Observational studyPloS one2024
Evaluation of a multiplex-qPCR for paediatric pleural empyema-An observational study in hospitalised children.
Observational study in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric pleural empyema - decision making beyond imaging - a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Nucleic acids in pleural fluid for the etiological diagnosis of pleural effusion.Translational lung cancer research · 2025Article
- Use of Polymerase Chain Reaction to Characterize the Etiology of Culture-Negative Empyema and Parapneumonic Effusion Among Alaska Native Children-2018-2023.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pleural empyema is a serious complication of pneumonia in children. Negative bacterial cultures commonly impede optimal antibiotic therapy. To improve bacterial identification, we developed a molecular assay and evaluated its performance compared with bacterial culture. Our multiplex-quantitative PCR to detect Streptococcus pneumoniae, Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus aureus and Haemophilus influenzae was assessed using bacterial genomic DNA and laboratory-prepared samples (n = 267). To evaluate clinical performance, we conducted the Molecular Assessment of Thoracic Empyema (MATE) observational study, enrolling children hospitalised with empyema. Pleural fluids were tested by bacterial culture and multiplex-qPCR, and performance determined using a study gold standard. We determined clinical sensitivity and time-to-organism-identification to assess the potential of the multiplex-qPCR to reduce the duration of empiric untargeted antibiotic therapy. Using spiked samples, the multiplex-qPCR demonstrated 213/215 (99.1%) sensitivity and 52/52 (100%) specificity for all organisms. During May 2019-March 2023, 100 children were enrolled in the MATE study; median age was 3.9 years (IQR 2-5.6). A bacterial pathogen was identified in 90/100 (90%) specimens by multiplex-qPCR, and 24/100 (24%) by bacterial culture (P <0.001). Multiplex-qPCR identified a bacterial cause in 68/76 (90%) culture-negative specimens. S. pneumoniae was the most common pathogen, identified in 67/100 (67%) specimens. We estimate our multiplex-qPCR would have reduced the duration of untargeted antibiotic therapy in 61% of cases by a median 20 days (IQR 17.5-23, range 1-55). Multiplex-qPCR significantly increased pathogen detection compared with culture and may allow for reducing the duration of untargeted antibiotic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.