Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38917161›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Deep learning for 3D cephalometric landmarking with heterogeneous multi-center CBCT dataset.

Jaakko Sahlsten, Jorma Järnstedt, Joel Jaskari, Hanna Naukkarinen, Phattaranant Mahasantipiya, Arnon Charuakkra, Krista Vasankari, Ari Hietanen, Osku Sundqvist, Antti Lehtinen and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jaakko SahlstenDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-7364-6502
Jorma JärnstedtDepartment of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa, Tampere, Finland.
Joel JaskariDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-6154-2378
Hanna NaukkarinenPlanmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland.
Phattaranant MahasantipiyaDepartment of Oral Biology and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Arnon CharuakkraDepartment of Oral Biology and Diagnostic Sciences, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Krista VasankariDepartment of Oral Diseases, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.ORCID 0009-0008-9836-6030
Ari HietanenPlanmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland.
Osku SundqvistPlanmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland.
Antti LehtinenDepartment of Radiology, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of Pirkanmaa, Tampere, Finland.
Kimmo KaskiDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-3805-9687

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cephalometric analysis is critically important and common procedure prior to orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery. Recently, deep learning approaches have been proposed for automatic 3D cephalometric analysis based on landmarking from CBCT scans. However, these approaches have relied on uniform datasets from a single center or imaging device but without considering patient ethnicity. In addition, previous works have considered a limited number of clinically relevant cephalometric landmarks and the approaches were computationally infeasible, both impairing integration into clinical workflow. Here our aim is to analyze the clinical applicability of a light-weight deep learning neural network for fast localization of 46 clinically significant cephalometric landmarks with multi-center, multi-ethnic, and multi-device data consisting of 309 CBCT scans from Finnish and Thai patients. The localization performance of our approach resulted in the mean distance of 1.99 ± 1.55 mm for the Finnish cohort and 1.96 ± 1.25 mm for the Thai cohort. This performance turned out to be clinically significant i.e., ≤ 2 mm with 61.7% and 64.3% of the landmarks with Finnish and Thai cohorts, respectively. Furthermore, the estimated landmarks were used to measure cephalometric characteristics successfully i.e., with ≤ 2 mm or ≤ 2° error, on 85.9% of the Finnish and 74.4% of the Thai cases. Between the two patient cohorts, 33 of the landmarks and all cephalometric characteristics had no statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) measured by the Mann-Whitney U test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction. Moreover, our method is found to be computationally light, i.e., providing the predictions with the mean duration of 0.77 s and 2.27 s with single machine GPU and CPU computing, respectively. Our findings advocate for the inclusion of this method into clinical settings based on its technical feasibility and robustness across varied clinical datasets.

Indexed as

Anatomic LandmarksCephalometryCone-Beam Computed TomographyDeep LearningImaging, Three-DimensionalAdolescentAdultFemaleFinlandHumansMaleThailandYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID38917161
PMCPMC11198780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.