Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38917131›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Exploring the perceptions of faculty members about research courses in undergraduate pharmacy curriculum: A qualitative study.

Aaliah Aly, Ola Hishari, Derek Stewart, Ahmed Awaisu, Sara Elshami, Banan Mukhalalati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aaliah AlyDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Practice, College of Pharmacy, QU-Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Ola HishariDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Practice, College of Pharmacy, QU-Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Derek StewartDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Practice, College of Pharmacy, QU-Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Ahmed AwaisuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Practice, College of Pharmacy, QU-Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-9029-8925
Sara ElshamiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Practice, College of Pharmacy, QU-Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.
Banan MukhalalatiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Practice, College of Pharmacy, QU-Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-0049-8879

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND

objectiveThe commitment of pharmacy graduates to patient care and research is crucial to advancing pharmaceutical science and practice. Consequently, the value of involving undergraduate pharmacy students in research has been increasingly recognized. Given that the College of Pharmacy at Qatar University offers two undergraduate pharmacy research courses, it is relevant to explore the perception of faculty members of the delivery, impact, facilitators, barriers, and suggested improvements in these courses. This exploration will help to improve the existing curriculum and to highlight the prospective impact of student involvement in undergraduate pharmacy research courses on the personal and professional growth of students, as well as on the progressive evolution of the pharmacy profession.

methodsA qualitative exploratory case study was performed in which five virtual focus groups were conducted. All eligible faculty members from the clinical pharmacy and pharmaceutical science departments with experience supervising students who had taken one or two undergraduate pharmacy research courses were invited to participate. The focus group questions were based on the Theoretical domain framework of behavioral determinants. Verbatim transcription was performed, and the collected data were thematically analyzed using the computer-assisted coding software NVivo®.

resultsOf the 26 eligible faculty members, 21 participated in this study. Five deductive themes were identified: social professional role and influences, beliefs about capabilities, skills, beliefs about consequences and goals, and environmental resources and behavioral regulations. Overall, faculty members identified themselves as assessors and mentors. Participants expected students to possess independence, responsibility, and motivation. They believed that students generally required more practical research skills. Several benefits of incorporating students into undergraduate research have been highlighted, including increased publication productivity and quality. However, several hurdles to undergraduate research in pharmacy have been identified, including limited resources, limited timeframes, and sometimes delayed ethical approval.

conclusionFaculty members expressed optimism regarding the undergraduate research courses. However, some logistical concerns, including the lengthy ethical approval process and resource availability, must be addressed to optimize the effectiveness of these courses.

Indexed as

CurriculumEducation, PharmacyQualitative ResearchAdultFacultyFaculty, PharmacyFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMalePerceptionPharmacy ResearchQatarStudents, Pharmacy

Identifiers

PMID38917131
PMCPMC11198811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.