ArticlePloS one2024
Users' perception of quality as a driver of private healthcare use in Mexico: Insights from the People's Voice Survey.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Financial protection in flux: longitudinal evidence on out-of-pocket spending among middle-aged and older Mexicans during the 'Seguro Popular'-INSABI transition.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
- Public and Private Healthcare Service Quality in Trujillo, Peru: Evidence from a SERVQUAL Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Perceptions of public and private health services in Poland: findings from a 2025 nationwide survey.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Health insurance in Nigeria: Findings from the People's Voice Survey.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- Clinical and economic burden of herpes zoster in Mexico: A retrospective medical chart analysis in a private healthcare setting.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Changes in health insurance coverage and healthcare utilization of middle-aged and older adults after the transition from Seguro Popular to INSABI.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Individual Behaviors and Health Inequalities: Preterm Birth During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Mexico.Population and development review · 2025Article
- Assessing the quality of childbirth care in Mexico: findings from the maternal eCohort.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Observational
- Quality of postnatal care for mothers and neonates in Mexico: Insights from the maternal eCohort study.PloS one · 2025Article
- A comprehensive assessment of care competence and maternal experience of first antenatal care visits in Mexico: Insights from the baseline survey of an observational cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe Mexican government has pursued multiple initiatives to improve healthcare coverage and financial protection. Yet, out-of-pocket health spending and use of private sector providers in Mexico remains high. In this paper, we sought to describe the characteristics of public and private healthcare users, describe recent visit quality across provider types, and to assess whether perceiving the public healthcare sector as poor quality is associated with private health sector use. METHODS AND
findingsWe analyzed the cross-sectional People's Voice Survey conducted from December 2022 to January 2023. We used Chi-square tests to compare contextual, individual, and need-for-care factors and ratings of most recent visits between users of public (social security and other public providers) and private sector providers (stand-alone private providers and providers adjacent to pharmacies). We used a multivariable Poisson regression model to assess associations between low ratings of public healthcare sources and the use of private care. Among the 811 respondents with a healthcare visit in the past year, 31.2% used private sources. Private healthcare users were more educated and had higher incomes than public healthcare users. Quality of most recent visit was rated more highly in private providers (70.2% rating the visit as excellent or very good for stand-alone private providers and 54.3% for pharmacy-adjacent doctors) compared to social security (41.6%) and other public providers (46.6%). Those who perceived public health institutions as low quality had a higher probability of seeking private healthcare.
conclusionUsers rated public care visits poorly relative to private care; at the population level, perceptions of poor quality care may drive private care use and hence out-of-pocket costs. Improving public healthcare quality is necessary to ensure universal health coverage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.