Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38916978›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2024

Norwegian general practitioners' and radiologists' perspectives on the referral, justification, and unnecessary imaging-a survey.

Elin Kjelle, Eivind Richter Andersen, Ingrid Øfsti Brandsæter, Bjørn Morten Hofmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elin KjelleInstitute for the Health Sciences at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, Gjøvik, Norway.
Eivind Richter AndersenInstitute for the Health Sciences at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, Gjøvik, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2573-4222
Ingrid Øfsti BrandsæterInstitute for the Health Sciences at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, Gjøvik, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0254-7953
Bjørn Morten HofmannInstitute for the Health Sciences at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, Gjøvik, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6709-4265

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study aimed to survey general practitioners' (GPs) and radiologists' perspectives on referrals, imaging justification, and unnecessary imaging in Norway. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe survey covered access to imaging, responsibilities, attitudes toward justification assessment, referral process, and demographics using multiple choice questions, statements to report agreement with using the Likert scale and one open question.

resultsForty radiologists and 58 GPs attending national conferences completed a web-based survey, with a 20/15% response rate, respectively. Both radiologists (97%) and GPs (100%) considered avoiding unnecessary examinations essential to their role in the healthcare service. Still, 91% of GPs admitted that they referred to imaging they thought was not helpful, while about 60% of the radiologists agreed that unnecessary imaging was conducted in their workplace. GPs reported pressure from patients and patients having private insurance as the most common reasons for doing unnecessary examinations. In contrast, radiologists reported a lack of clinical information and the inability to discuss patient cases with the GPs as the most common reasons.

conclusionThis study adds to our understanding of radiologists' and GPs' perspectives on unnecessary imaging and referrals. Better guidelines and, even more importantly, better communication between the referrer and the radiologist are needed. Addressing these issues can reduce unnecessary imaging and improve the quality and safety of care.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGeneral PractitionersRadiologistsReferral and ConsultationUnnecessary ProceduresAdultCommunicationDiagnostic ImagingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and Questionnairesdiagnostic imagingGeneral practitionerjustificationOverutilizationradiologistreferralSurvey

Identifiers

PMID38916978
PMCPMC11552244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.