Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38916975›Full record

Observational studyClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2024

Clinical Subphenotypes of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Maaike C Swets, Zsuzsa Bakk, Annette C Westgeest, Karla Berry, George Cooper, Wynne Sim, Rui Shian Lee, Tze Yi Gan, William Donlon, Antonia Besu and 14 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07148960 (Does Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia Early Dual Therapy Improve Outcomes?), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07148960 phase4enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Does Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia Early Dual Therapy Improve Outcomes? (SABEDTIO) Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWest Virginia UniversityRan2025 to 2027Enrolled300ConditionsStaphylococcus Aureus BacteremiaArmsEarly Dual IV Antibiotic Therapy - MRSA, Early Dual IV Antibiotic Therapy - MSSA, Single Agent IV Antibiotic Therapy - MRSA, Single Agent IV Antibiotic Therapy - MSSA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Empirical Antibiotic Activity and Outcomes in Pediatric Gram-negative Bloodstream Infections: A Rank-based Composite Outcome Analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Impact of Methicillin Resistance on Outcomes ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  5. Reproducible Identification of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia Clinical Subphenotypes.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Adjunctive Fosfomycin for the Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Pooled Post Hoc Analysis of Individual Participant Data From 2 Randomized Trials.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Adjunctive β-lactams forTherapeutic advances in infectious disease
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Maaike C SwetsDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Zsuzsa BakkDepartment of Methodology and Statistics, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Annette C WestgeestDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Karla BerryCentre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
George CooperCentre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Wynne SimEdinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Rui Shian LeeEdinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Tze Yi GanEdinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
William DonlonEdinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Antonia BesuEdinburgh Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Emily HeppenstallCentre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Luke TysallMedical Microbiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Simon DewarClinical Infection Research Group, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Mark de BoerDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Vance G FowlerDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
David H DockrellCentre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Guy E ThwaitesOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Miquel PujolDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Bellvitge University Hospital, L´Hospitalet de LLobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Natàlia PallarèsBiostatistics Support and Research Unit, Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute and Hospital, Badalona, Spain.
Cristian TebéBiostatistics Support and Research Unit, Germans Trias i Pujol Research Institute and Hospital, Badalona, Spain.
Jordi CarratalàDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Bellvitge University Hospital, L´Hospitalet de LLobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Alexander SzubertMRC Clinical Trials Unit, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Geert H GroeneveldDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Clark D RussellCentre for Inflammation Research, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9873-8243

Funding

HLA Fine Mapping to Elucidate S. aureus SusceptibilityR01AI165671 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI FOWLER, VANCE G., SCOTT, WILLIAM K · 2021 to 2025
$3.8M
Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_UU_00004/05National Institute for Health ResearchNHSNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI165671NIH HHSWellcome Trust 214178/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStaphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is a clinically heterogeneous disease. The ability to identify subgroups of patients with shared traits (subphenotypes) is an unmet need to allow patient stratification for clinical management and research. We aimed to test the hypothesis that clinically relevant subphenotypes can be reproducibly identified among patients with SAB.

methodsWe studied 3 cohorts of adults with monomicrobial SAB: a UK retrospective observational study (Edinburgh cohort, n = 458), the UK ARREST trial (n = 758), and the Spanish SAFO trial (n = 214). Latent class analysis was used to identify subphenotypes using routinely collected clinical data without considering outcomes. Mortality and microbiologic outcomes were then compared between subphenotypes.

resultsIncluded patients had predominantly methicillin-susceptible SAB (1366 of 1430, 95.5%). We identified 5 distinct, reproducible clinical subphenotypes: (A) SAB associated with older age and comorbidity, (B) nosocomial intravenous catheter-associated SAB in younger people without comorbidity, (C) community-acquired metastatic SAB, (D) SAB associated with chronic kidney disease, and (E) SAB associated with injection drug use. Survival and microbiologic outcomes differed between the subphenotypes. Mortality was highest in subphenotype A and lowest in subphenotypes B and E. Microbiologic outcomes were worse in subphenotype C. In a secondary analysis of the ARREST trial, adjunctive rifampicin was associated with increased mortality in subphenotype B and improved microbiologic outcomes in subphenotype C.

conclusionsWe have identified reproducible and clinically relevant subphenotypes within SAB and provide proof of principle of differential treatment effects. Through clinical trial enrichment and patient stratification, these subphenotypes could contribute to a personalized medicine approach to SAB.

Indexed as

BacteremiaStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomAnti-Bacterial Agentsadjunctive treatmentbacteraemiapatient stratificationStaphylococcus aureussubphenotypes

Identifiers

PMID38916975
PMCPMC11581694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.