Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38916893›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Lung Donation and Transplant Recipient Outcomes at Independent vs Hospital-Based Donor Care Units.

Emily A Vail, Xingmei Wang, Douglas E Schaubel, Peter P Reese, Edward Cantu, Niels D Martin, Peter L Abt, Kim M Olthoff, Meeta P Kerlin, Jason D Christie and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Heart donation and transplant recipient survival outcomes from deceased organ donors managed in hospital-based vs independent donor care units.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Emily A VailDepartment of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Xingmei WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Douglas E SchaubelDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Peter P ReeseLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Edward CantuPenn Transplant Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Niels D MartinDepartment of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Peter L AbtPenn Transplant Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kim M OlthoffPenn Transplant Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Meeta P KerlinLeonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jason D ChristiePenn Transplant Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Mark D NeumanDepartment of Anesthesiology & Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.

Funding

Survival Analysis Methods for Organ Failure DataR01DK070869 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DOUGLAS EARL SCHAUBEL · 2005 to 2026
$4.7M
Mentored research in solid organ transplantation: outcomes using organs from Hepatitis C virus infected donors for uninfected recipientsK24AI146137 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REESE, PETER PHILIP · 2019 to 2023
$671k
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI146137NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK070869
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Centralizing deceased organ donor management and organ recovery into donor care units (DCUs) may mitigate the critical organ shortage by positively impacting donation and recipient outcomes. Objective: To compare donation and lung transplant outcomes between 2 common DCU models: independent (outside of acute-care hospitals) and hospital-based. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective cohort study of Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network deceased donor registry and lung transplant recipient files from 21 US donor service areas with an operating DCU. Characteristics and lung donation rates among deceased donors cared for in independent vs hospital-based DCUs were compared. Eligible participants included deceased organ donors (aged 16 years and older) after brain death, who underwent organ recovery procedures between April 26, 2017, and June 30, 2022, and patients who received lung transplants from those donors. Data analysis was conducted from May 2023 to March 2024. Exposure: Organ recovery in an independent DCU (vs hospital-based DCU). Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was duration of transplanted lung survival (through December 31, 2023) among recipients of lung(s) transplanted from cohort donors. A Cox proportional hazards model stratified by transplant year and program, adjusting for donor and recipient characteristics was used to compare graft survival. Results: Of 10 856 donors in the starting sample (mean [SD] age, 42.8 [15.2] years; 6625 male [61.0%] and 4231 female [39.0%]), 5149 (primary comparison group) underwent recovery procedures in DCUs including 1466 (28.4%) in 11 hospital-based DCUs and 3683 (71.5%) in 10 independent DCUs. Unadjusted lung donation rates were higher in DCUs than local hospitals, but lower in hospital-based vs independent DCUs (418 donors [28.5%] vs 1233 donors [33.5%]; P < .001). Among 1657 transplant recipients, 1250 (74.5%) received lung(s) from independent DCUs. Median (range) duration of follow-up after transplant was 734 (0-2292) days. Grafts recovered from independent DCUs had shorter restricted mean (SE) survival times than grafts from hospital-based DCUs (1548 [27] days vs 1665 [50] days; P = .04). After adjustment, graft failure remained higher among lungs recovered from independent DCUs than hospital-based DCUs (hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.28-2.65). Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective analysis of national donor and transplant recipient data, although lung donation rates were higher from deceased organ donors after brain death cared for in independent DCUs, lungs recovered from donors in hospital-based DCUs survived longer. These findings suggest that further work is necessary to understand which factors (eg, donor transfer, management, or lung evaluation and acceptance practices) differ between DCU models and may contribute to these differences.

Indexed as

Lung TransplantationTissue and Organ ProcurementAdultFemaleGraft SurvivalHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRetrospective StudiesTissue DonorsTransplant RecipientsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID38916893
PMCPMC11200140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.