Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38916889›Full record

Observational studyJAMA network open2024

Prostate Cancer Among Black Men in Canada.

Patrick Albers, Safaa Bashir, Nikhile Mookerji, Stacey Broomfield, Anaïs Medina Martín, Sunita Ghosh, Adam Kinnaird

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The rural disadvantage - prostate cancer outcomes of rural and urban patients over 25 years.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  6. Prostate cancer statistics, 2025.CA: a cancer journal for clinicians
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patrick AlbersDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Safaa BashirBlack Medical Students Association, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Nikhile MookerjiDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Stacey BroomfieldDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Anaïs Medina MartínAlberta Prostate Cancer Research Initiative, Alberta, Canada.
Sunita GhoshDepartment of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Adam KinnairdDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prostate cancer is a prevalent disease among men worldwide, exhibiting substantial heterogeneity in presentation and outcomes influenced by various factors, including race and ethnicity. Disparities in incidence, stage at diagnosis, and survival rates have been observed between Black men and those of other races and ethnicities. Objective: To compare prostate cancer outcomes between Black men and men with other race (Asian, Hispanic, Indigenous, Middle Eastern, White, Multiracial, and Other) in a universal health care system, with race and ethnicity self-reported. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prospective, observational cohort study of men diagnosed with prostate cancer between June 1, 2014, and August 28, 2023, who self-identified race and ethnicity. Participants included men who had been prospectively enrolled in the Alberta Prostate Cancer Research Initiative from the 2 major urology referral centers in Alberta (University of Alberta and University of Calgary). All men with prostate cancer enrolled in the initiative were included. Exposure: Race and ethnicity. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the stage and grade of prostate cancer at diagnosis. Further outcomes included age and prostate-specific antigen level at diagnosis, initial treatment modality, time from diagnosis to initial treatment, and prostate cancer-specific, metastasis-free, and overall survivals. Results: A total of 6534 men were included; 177 (2.7%) were Black, and 6357 (97.3%) had another race or ethnicity. Men who identified as Black were diagnosed with prostate cancer at an earlier age (mean [SD], 62.0 [8.2] compared with 64.6 [7.7] years; P < .001) and had a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index rating (14% compared with 7% ≤ 1; P < .001) compared with men of other races. Men who identified as Black had similar prostate-specific antigen levels at diagnosis, TNM category (74% vs 74% with T1-T2; P = .83) and Gleason Grade Group (34% compared with 35% Gleason Grade Group 1; P = .63). Black men had similar rates of prostate cancer-specific (hazard ratio [HR], 1.10; 95% CI, 0.41-2.97; P = .85), metastasis-free (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.42-1.46; P = .44), and overall (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.25-1.24; P = .15) survival. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that Black men, despite being diagnosed at a younger age, experience comparable prostate cancer outcomes compared with men of other races.

Indexed as

Black PeopleProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAlbertaAsian PeopleCanadaEthnicityHispanic or LatinoHumansIndigenous CanadiansMaleMiddle AgedMiddle Eastern PeopleNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID38916889
PMCPMC11200144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.