Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38916821›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2024

Outcomes of older adults with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) receiving chemotherapy: a single-institution experience.

Akshara Singareeka Raghavendra, Diane Liu, Yu Shen, Carlos H Barcenas, Naoto T Ueno, Sharon Giordano, Debu Tripathy, Meghan Sri Karuturi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Akshara Singareeka RaghavendraDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1354, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Diane LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Yu ShenDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Carlos H BarcenasDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1354, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Naoto T UenoUniversity of Hawai'i Cancer Center, Honolulu, HI, USA.
Sharon GiordanoDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1354, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Debu TripathyDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1354, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Meghan Sri KaruturiDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1354, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. mskaruturi@mdanderson.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite lower chemotherapy use in older triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients, their outcomes match younger counterparts. We compared outcomes in early-stage TNBC patients by age receiving chemotherapy at a major cancer center with a national TNBC database.

methodsRetrospective study using institutional data on stage I-III TNBC (ER/PR < 10%) women with neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy. Based on their ages at diagnosis, patients were stratified into four categories: ≤40, 41-59, 60-69, and ≥ 70 years. Demographic and clinical characteristics recorded included race, disease stage, ER/PR positivity, treatment regimen, lymphatic or vascular invasion (LVI), histologic grade, Ki-67 level, body mass index (BMI), and pathologic complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant treatment and are summarized using descriptive statistics. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and distant disease-free survival (DDFS); all were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Both univariate and multivariate (MV) Cox regressions were applied to evaluate the impact of important covariates on these time-to-event endpoints.

resultsOf the 2336 patients studied, 492 (21.1%) were ≤ 40 years old, 1239 (53.1%) were 41-59, 461 (19.7%) were 60-69, and 144 (6.2%) were ≥ 70. In the univariate regression model of OS/DFS/DDFS, age ≥ 70 was significantly associated with worse OS (p = 0.0217); other factors associated with worse OS were non-anthracycline-based chemotherapy, higher tumor stage, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The multivariate Cox regression model, adjusted for race and stage, showed no significant effects of age on OS; however, patients ≥ 70 years old who received non-anthracycline treatment combinations had worse DFS (hazard ratio = 0.349 vs. 1.049, p = 0.0293) and DDFS (hazard ratio = 0.317 vs. 1.016, p = 0.0251) than patients ≤ 40 years old. DFS from MV model after adjusting for age, race, and disease stage, the hazard ratio between anthracycline + taxane treatments and anthracycline + other treatments in patients ≥ 70 years old was statistically significantly lower than in patients ≤ 40 years old (hazard ratios [HRs] = 0.349 vs. 1.049, p = 0.0293).

conclusionsOur findings indicate that outcomes such as DFS are less favorable in older compared to younger patients with early-stage TNBC, primarily in those who did not receive an anthracycline based chemotherapy regimen.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnthracyclineBreast cancerChemotherapyOlder adultsStageTriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID38916821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.