Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38916806›Full record

ReviewCurrent nutrition reports2024

Assessing and Monitoring Nutrition Security in the United States: A Narrative Review of Current Measures and Instruments.

Emma Kenney, Victoria O Adebiyi, Hilary K Seligman, Mariah D Ehmke, Joanne F Guthrie, Alisha Coleman-Jensen, Edward A Frongillo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current nutrition reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emma KenneyDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Discovery I Building, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA. emkenney@email.sc.edu.
Victoria O AdebiyiDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Discovery I Building, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.
Hilary K SeligmanDivision of General Internal Medicine and Center for Vulnerable Populations, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Mariah D EhmkeUnited States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC, USA.
Joanne F GuthrieUnited States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC, USA.
Alisha Coleman-JensenUnited States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DC, USA.
Edward A FrongilloDepartment of Health Promotion, Education, and Behavior, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Discovery I Building, 915 Greene Street, Columbia, SC, 29208, USA.

Funding

Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
Economic Research Service,United States 58-4000-1-0084Economic Research Service,United States 58-4000-1-0093NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewBecause nutrition plays a crucial role in the development of chronic diseases, ensuring nutrition security is important for promoting population health. Nutrition security is defined as having consistent and equitable access to healthy, safe, affordable foods essential to optimal health and well-being. Distinguished from food security, nutrition security consists of two constructs: healthy diets and nutritional status. The study aimed to identify population measures that reflect the important constructs of nutrition security (i.e., healthy diets and nutritional status) to inform U.S. nutrition security assessment and monitoring. RECENT

findingsThrough a narrative review conducted across multiple databases, associations between subconstructs of healthy diets and nutritional status were identified. Of the six subconstructs that constitute healthy diets, nutrient adequacy and moderation were most often used to assess and monitor healthfulness of U.S. population diets and were associated with health outcomes. There is little evidence of an association between health outcomes and macronutrient balance or diversity in the U.S. Thirteen instruments were identified as potentially suitable for measuring at least one subconstruct of healthy diet in the population. This review highlights the importance of nutrition security in addressing population health challenges. It emphasizes the potential use of multiple instruments and measures to comprehensively monitor population nutrition security and inform intervention strategies. Identifying feasible and practical measures for assessing and monitoring nutrition security is imperative for advancing population health and mitigating the burden of chronic diseases.

Indexed as

Food SecurityNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentDiet, HealthyFood SupplyHumansUnited StatesAssessmentBrief instrumentsFood securityHealthMonitoringNutrition security

Identifiers

PMID38916806
PMCPMC11327197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.