ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2024
Predicting renal damage in children with IgA vasculitis by machine learning.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk prediction models for renal injury in children with IgA vasculitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Vasculitides: A Systematic Review.ACR open rheumatology · 2025Review
- Biomarker research for Henoch-Schönlein purpura nephritis based on "omics" techniques.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChildren with IgA Vasculitis (IgAV) may develop renal complications, which can impact their long-term prognosis. This study aimed to build a machine learning model to predict renal damage in children with IgAV and analyze risk factors for IgA Vasculitis with Nephritis (IgAVN).
methods50 clinical indicators were collected from 217 inpatients at our hospital. Six machine learning algorithms-Logistic Regression, Linear Discriminant Analysis, K-Nearest Neighbor, Support Vector Machine, Decision Trees, and Random Forest-were utilized to select the model with the highest predictive performance. A simplified model was developed through feature importance ranking and validated by an additional cohort with 46 patients.
resultsThe random forest model had the highest accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the curve, with values of 0.91, 0.98, 0.70, 0.79 and 0.94, respectively. The top 11 features according to the importance ranking were anti-streptolysin O, corticosteroids therapy, antihistamine therapy, absolute eosinophil count, immunoglobulin E, anticoagulant therapy, C-reactive protein, prothrombin time, age at onset, D-dimer, recurrence of rash ≥ 3 times. A simplified model using these features demonstrated optimal performance with an accuracy of 84.2%, a sensitivity of 89.4%, and a specificity of 82.5% in external validation. Finally, we provided a web tool based on the simplified model, whose code was published on https://github.com/mulanruo/IgAVN_Prediction .
conclusionThe model based on the random forest algorithm demonstrates good performance in predicting renal damage in children with IgAV, providing a basis for early clinical diagnosis and decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38916780What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.