Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38916761›Full record

Observational studySupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

Adherence to oral anticancer treatments: network and sentiment analysis exploring perceived internal and external determinants in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

M Masiero, G E Spada, E Fragale, M Pezzolato, E Munzone, V Sanchini, R Pietrobon, L Teixeira, M Valencia, A Machiavelli and 3 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

M MasieroDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy. marianna.masiero@unimi.it.
G E SpadaApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
E FragaleApplied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
M PezzolatoDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
E MunzoneDivision of Medical Senology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
V SanchiniDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
R PietrobonSporeData Inc, Durham, NC, USA.
L TeixeiraSporeData Inc, Durham, NC, USA.
M ValenciaSporeData Inc, Durham, NC, USA.
A MachiavelliSporeData Inc, Durham, NC, USA.
R WoloskiSporeData Inc, Durham, NC, USA.
C MarzoratiDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
G PravettoniDepartment of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdherence to oral anticancer treatments (OATs) is a critical issue in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) to enhance survivorship and quality of life. The study is aimed to analyze the main themes and attributes related to OATs in MBC patients. This research is part of a project titled "Enhancing Therapy Adherence Among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients" designed to produce a predictive model of non-adherence, a decision support system, and guidelines to improve adherence to OATs.

methodsThe study consists of an exploratory observational and qualitative analysis using a focus group method. A semi-structured interview guide was developed to handle relevant OAT themes. Wordcloud plots, network analysis, and sentiment analysis were performed.

resultsNineteen female MBC patients participated in the protocol (age mean 55.95, SD = 6.87). Four main themes emerged: (theme 1) individual clinical pathway; (theme 2) barriers to adherence; (theme 3) resources to adherence; (theme 4) patients' perception of new technologies. The Wordcloud and network analysis highlighted the important role of treatment side effects and the relationship with the clinician in the modulation of adherence behavior. This result is consistent with the sentiment analysis underscoring patients experience fear of issues related to clinical values and ineffective communication and discontinuity of the doctor in charge of the patient care.

conclusionThe study highlighted the key role of the individual, relational variables, and side effects as internal and external determinants influencing adherence to MBC. Finally, the opportunity offered by eHealth technology to connect with other patients with similar conditions and share experiences could be a relief for MBC patients.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsDrug MonitoringFocus GroupsAdministration, OralAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeAntineoplastic AgentsBarriersMetastatic breast cancerTherapy

Identifiers

PMID38916761
PMCPMC11199233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.