Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38916760›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2024

Explaining the influence of practice on the grooved pegboard times of older adults: role of force steadiness.

Sajjad Daneshgar, Taylor Tvrdy, Roger M Enoka

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07011160 (Neural Substrates Underlying Adaptations in Manual Dexterity of Older Adults), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07011160 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Neural Substrates Underlying Adaptations in Manual Dexterity of Older Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, BoulderRan2026 to 2030Enrolled72ConditionsAging HandsArmsTranscutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), Familiarization
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sajjad DaneshgarDepartment of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.
Taylor TvrdyDepartment of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.
Roger M EnokaDepartment of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA. enoka@colorado.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7881-2397

Funding

STEADINESS IN OLDER ADULTSR01AG009000 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI ENOKA, ROGER M. · 1990 to 2009
$2.3M
Multiple Sclerosis Foundation RG-2206-39688NIA NIH HHS R01 AG009000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose was to identify the variables that can explain the variance in the grooved pegboard times of older adults categorized as either fast or slow performers. Participants (n = 28; 60-83 years) completed two experimental sessions, before and after 6 practice sessions of the grooved pegboard test. The 2 groups were identified based on average pegboard times during the practice sessions. Average pegboard time during practice was 73 ± 11 s for the fast group and 85 ± 13 s for the slow group. Explanatory variables for the pegboard times before and after practice were the durations of 4 peg-manipulation phases and 12 measures of force steadiness (coefficient of variation [CV] for force) during isometric contractions with the index finger abductor and wrist extensor muscles. Time to complete the grooved pegboard test after practice decreased by 25 ± 11% for the fast group and by 28 ± 10% for the slow group. Multiple regression models explained more of the variance in the pegboard times for the fast group before practice (Adjusted R

Indexed as

Psychomotor PerformanceAgedAged, 80 and overAgingFemaleHumansIsometric ContractionMaleMiddle AgedMotor SkillsMuscle, SkeletalPractice, PsychologicalAgingForce steadinessGrooved pegboard testHand functionManual dexterity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.