ArticleAging and disease2024
Deep Learning Based on Computed Tomography Predicts Response to Chemoimmunotherapy in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Article in Aging and disease, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Radiomics-Based AI for Predicting Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy Pathological Response in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- CT-based radiomics in predicting the efficacy of preoperative neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Fusion of Clinical and Deep Learning Features for Predicting Pembrolizumab Monotherapy Response in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Deep interpretable radiogenomic workflow deciphers tumor microenvironment from breast MRI and identifies clinician-interpretable biomarkers.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional multimodal imaging for predicting early recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Longitudinal CT-based deep learning radiomics for predicting prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy: a two-center study.Journal of Cancer · 2026Article
- Computed tomography-based quantification of intra-tumoral heterogeneity for predicting treatment response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter retrospective study.Translational cancer research · 2025Article
- Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting progression-free survival after immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Development and validation of an LDCT-based deep learning radiomics nomogram for predicting postoperative recurrence of stage Ia lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- A CT-based deep learning model for preoperative prediction of spread through air spaces in clinical stage I lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) often carries a dire prognosis. The advent of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (NCI) has become a promising approach in NSCLC treatment, making the identification of reliable biomarkers for major pathological response (MPR) crucial. This study aimed to devise a deep learning (DL) model to estimate the MPR to NCI in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) patients and uncover its biological mechanism. We enrolled a cohort of 309 LUSC patients from various medical institutions. A ResNet50 model, trained on contrast-enhanced computed tomography images, was developed, and validated to predict MPR. We examined somatic mutations, genomic data, tumor-infiltrating immune cells, and intra-tumor microorganisms. Post-treatment, 149 (48.22%) patients exhibited MPR. The DL model demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy, evidenced by an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.98-1.00) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81-0.98) in the first and second validation sets, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the DL model score (low vs. high) as an independent predictor of MPR. The prediction of MPR (P-MPR) correlated with mutations in four genes, as well as gene ontology and pathways tied to immune response and antigen processing and presentation. Analysis also highlighted diversity in immune cells within the tumor microenvironment and in peripheral blood. Moreover, the presence of four distinct bacteria varied among intra-tumor microorganisms. Our DL model proved highly effective in predicting MPR in LUSC patients undergoing NCI, significantly advancing our understanding of the biological mechanisms involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.