Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38916703›Full record

ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2024

Heavy-metal associated breast cancer and colorectal cancer hot spots and their demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.

Madeline M Tomlinson, Felicia Pugh, Alexandra N Nail, Johnnie D Newton, Karen Udoh, Stephie Abraham, Sandy Kavalukas, Brian Guinn, Rulla M Tamimi, Francine Laden and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Madeline M TomlinsonDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, 485 E Gray St, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Felicia PughDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, 485 E Gray St, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Alexandra N NailDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Johnnie D NewtonDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, 485 E Gray St, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Karen UdohDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Stephie AbrahamDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, 485 E Gray St, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Sandy KavalukasDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Brian GuinnDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, 485 E Gray St, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA.
Rulla M TamimiDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical, New York, NY, USA.
Francine LadenChanning Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Hari S IyerSection of Cancer Epidemiology and Health Outcomes, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
J Christopher StatesDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Matthew RutherDepartment of Urban and Public Affairs, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
C Tyler EllisDepartment of Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Natalie C DuPréDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, School of Public Health and Information Sciences, University of Louisville, 485 E Gray St, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA. natalie.dupre@louisville.edu.

Funding

University of Louisville Center for Integrative Environmental Health SciencesP30ES030283 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI J CHRISTOPHER STATES · 2020 to 2026
$10.0M
UOFL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES TRAINING PROGRAMT32ES011564 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI David W Hein, John Pierce Wise · 2004 to 2026
$7.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES030283NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES011564
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer registries offer an avenue to identify cancer clusters across large populations and efficiently examine potential environmental harms affecting cancer. The role of known metal carcinogens (i.e., cadmium, arsenic, nickel, chromium(VI)) in breast and colorectal carcinogenesis is largely unknown. Historically marginalized communities are disproportionately exposed to metals, which could explain cancer disparities. We examined area-based metal exposures and odds of residing in breast and colorectal cancer hotspots utilizing state tumor registry data and described the characteristics of those living in heavy metal-associated cancer hotspots.

methodsBreast and colorectal cancer hotspots were mapped across Kentucky, and area-based ambient metal exposure to cadmium, arsenic, nickel, and chromium(VI) were extracted from the 2014 National Air Toxics Assessment for Kentucky census tracts. Among colorectal cancer (n = 56,598) and female breast cancer (n = 77,637) diagnoses in Kentucky, we used logistic regression models to estimate Odds Ratios (ORs) and 95% Confidence Intervals to examine the association between ambient metal concentrations and odds of residing in cancer hotspots, independent of individual-level and neighborhood risk factors.

resultsHigher ambient metal exposures were associated with higher odds of residing in breast and colorectal cancer hotspots. Populations in breast and colorectal cancer hotspots were disproportionately Black and had markers of lower socioeconomic status. Furthermore, adjusting for age, race, tobacco and neighborhood factors did not significantly change cancer hotspot ORs for ambient metal exposures analyzed.

conclusionAmbient metal exposures contribute to higher cancer rates in certain geographic areas that are largely composed of marginalized populations. Individual-level assessments of metal exposures and cancer disparities are needed.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsEnvironmental ExposureMetals, HeavySocioeconomic FactorsAdultAgedFemaleHumansKentuckyMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesRisk FactorsMetals, HeavyArsenicBreast cancerCadmiumCancer registryColorectal cancerMetals

Identifiers

PMID38916703
PMCPMC11461597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.