ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2024
Material density dual-energy CT images: value added in early diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis : Original research.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effect of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy on patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Peritoneal metastasis in pancreatic cancer: molecular mechanisms, microenvironmental remodeling, and emerging intraperitoneal interventions.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Review
- Improved detection and quantification of peritoneal metastases using delayed contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT scans.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- Italian radiologists and dual-energy CT: a state of the art from a shared document by the computed tomography subspecialty section of the Italian society of radiology.La Radiologia medica · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the value of material density (MD) images generated from a rapid kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT (rsDECT) in early detection of peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty patients (60 ± 13 years; 24 women) with PC detected on multiple abdominal DECT scans were included. Four separate DECTs with varying findings of PC from each patient were used for qualitative/quantitative analysis, resulting in a total of 120 DECT scans (n = 30 × 4). Three radiologists independently reviewed DECT images (65 keV alone and 65 keV + MD) for diagnosis of PC (diagnostic confidence, lesion conspicuity, sharpness/delineation and image quality) using a 5-point Likert scale. Quantitative estimation of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was done. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Odds ratio calculation were used to compare between the two protocols. Inter-observer agreement was evaluated using Kappa coefficient analysis. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
results65 keV + MD images showed a slightly higher sensitivity (89%[95%CI:84,92]) for PC detection compared with 65 keV images alone without statistical significance (84%[95%CI:78,88], p = 0.11) with the experienced reader showing significant improvement (98%[95%CI:93,100] vs. 90%[95%CI:83,94], p = 0.02). On a per-patient basis, use of MD images allowed earlier diagnosis for PC in an additional 13-23% of patients. On sub-group analysis, earlier diagnosis of PC was particularly beneficial in patients with BMI ≤ 29.9 kg/m
conclusionMD images allow earlier and improved detection of PC with the degree of benefit varying based on reader experience and patient body habitus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38916617What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.