Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38916554›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice2024

How does fresh food prescribing fit into the social service landscape? A qualitative study in Ontario, Canada.

Laura Jane Brubacher, Matthew Little, Abby Richter, Warren Dodd

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Food prescribing in Canada: evidence, critiques and opportunities.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2024
    Article
  8. Social prescribing in Canada: health promotion in action, 50 years after the Lalonde report.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura Jane BrubacherSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Matthew LittleSchool of Public Health and Social Policy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Abby RichterGuelph Community Health Centre, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Warren DoddSchool of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFood prescription programs are part of the broader social prescribing movement as an approach to address food insecurity and suboptimal diet in health care settings. These programs exist amid other social services, including income-based supports and food assistance programs; however, evaluations of the interactions between these programs and pre-existing services and supports are limited. This study was embedded within a larger evaluation of the 52-week Fresh Food Prescription (FFRx) program (April 2021-October 2022); the objective of this study was to examine how program participation influenced individuals' interactions with existing income-based supports and food assistance programs.

methodsThis study was conducted in Guelph, Ontario, Canada. One-to-one (n = 23) and follow-up (n = 10) interviews were conducted to explore participants' experiences with the program. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically using a constant comparative analysis.

resultsParticipants described their experience with FFRx in relation to existing income-based supports and food assistance programs. FFRx reportedly extended income support further to cover living expenses, allowed participants to divert income to other necessities, and reduced the sacrifices required to meet basic needs. FFRx lessened the frequency of accessing other food assistance programs. Aspects of FFRx's design (e.g. food delivery) shaped participant preferences in favour of FFRx over other food supports.

conclusionAs food prescribing and other social prescribing programs continue to expand, there is a need to evaluate how these initiatives interact with pre-existing services and supports and shape the broader social service landscape.

Indexed as

Food AssistanceFood InsecurityQualitative ResearchSocial WorkAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOntariofood access programsfood insecurityfood prescribingqualitative researchsocial services

Identifiers

PMID38916554
PMCPMC11346765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.