Quantum-Quantum and Quantum-Quantum-Classical Schemes for Near-Gap Excitations with Projection-Based-Embedded

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. GW Approximation Coupled with Classical Fluctuating Charges and Dipoles.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026
   Article
2. Density Functional Theory for Molecular and Periodic Systems in TURBOMOLE: Theory, Implementation, and Applications.The journal of physical chemistry. A · 2025
   Article
3. Optical Gaps of Ionic Materials from GW/BSE-in-DFT and CC2-in-DFT.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract