ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2024
Broadening access to small-molecule parameterization with the force field toolkit.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Molecular insights of acarbose metabolization catalyzed by acarbose-preferred glucosidase.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Access to accurate force-field parameters for small molecules is crucial for computational studies of their interactions with proteins. Although a number of general force fields for small molecules exist, e.g., CGenFF, GAFF, and OPLS, they do not cover all common chemical groups and their combinations. The Force Field Toolkit (ffTK) provides a comprehensive graphical interface that streamlines the development of classical parameters for small molecules directly from quantum mechanical (QM) calculations, allowing for force-field generation for almost any chemical group and validation of the fit relative to the target data. ffTK relies on supported external software for the QM calculations, but it can generate the necessary QM input files and parse and analyze the QM output. In previous ffTK versions, support for Gaussian and ORCA QM packages was implemented. Here, we add support for Psi4, an open-source QM package free for all users, thereby broadening user access to ffTK. We also compare the parameter sets obtained with the new ffTK version using Gaussian, ORCA, and Psi4 for three molecules: pyrrolidine, n-propylammonium cation, and chlorobenzene. Despite minor differences between the resulting parameter sets for each compound, most prominently in the dihedral and improper terms, we show that conformational distributions sampled in molecular dynamics simulations using these parameter sets are quite comparable.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.