Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38916262›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine2024

Factors influencing deprescribing in primary care for those towards the end of life: A qualitative interview study with patients and healthcare practitioners.

Maike S van der Waal, Saskia Ccm Teunissen, Allegonda G Uyttewaal, Cathelijne Verboeket-Crul, Hanneke Smits-Pelser, Eric Ct Geijteman, Matthew P Grant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maike S van der WaalCenter of Expertise in Palliative Care Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8021-3510
Saskia Ccm TeunissenCenter of Expertise in Palliative Care Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Allegonda G UyttewaalAcademic Hospice Demeter, De Bilt, The Netherlands.
Cathelijne Verboeket-CrulAcademic Hospice Demeter, De Bilt, The Netherlands.
Hanneke Smits-PelserLeidsche Rijn Julius Healthcare Center, Parkwijk, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eric Ct GeijtemanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7354-2220
Matthew P GrantCenter of Expertise in Palliative Care Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor people with limited lifetime expectancy, the benefit of many medications may be outweighed by their potential harms. Despite the relevance of reducing unnecessary medication use, deprescribing is poorly enacted in primary care practice.

aimThis study aims to describe factors, as identified by primary care professionals and patients, that influence deprescribing in the last phase of life.

designSemi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using a thematic approach. SETTING/

participantsThis study was performed in primary care settings, including general practices, hospices and community care teams in The Netherlands. Purposefully identified primary care professionals (general practitioners, pharmacists, nurses) and patients with limited lifetime expectancy due to advanced chronic illness or cancer and their caretakers were interviewed.

resultsThree themes emerged detailing factors influencing deprescribing in the last phase of life in primary care: (1) non-maleficence, the wish to avoid additional psychological or physical distress; (2) reactive care, the lack of priority and awareness of eligible patients; and (3) discontinuity of care within primary care and between primary care and specialty care.

conclusionsDeprescribing is an incremental process, complicated by the unpredictability of life expectancy and attitudes of patients and health care professionals that associate continued medication use with clinical stability. Opportunities to facilitate the deprescribing process and its acceptance include the routinely systematic identification of patients with limited life expectancy and potentially inappropriate medications, and normalisation of deprescribing as component of regular primary care, occurring for all patients and continuing into end-of-life care.

Indexed as

DeprescriptionsPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchTerminal CareAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsDeprescribingend-of-life careinterview studyprimary care

Identifiers

PMID38916262
PMCPMC11528977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.