Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38916176›Full record

ReviewRevista de neurologia2024

[Inhaled levodopa: from evidence to experience].

J C Martínez-Castrillo, I Pareés-Moreno, J L López Sendón-Moreno, P Pérez-Torre, S Fanjul, A Patiño-Patón, G García-Ribas, A Alonso-Cánovas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista de neurologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J C Martínez-CastrilloHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, España.
I Pareés-MorenoHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, España.
J L López Sendón-MorenoHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, España.
P Pérez-TorreHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, España.
S FanjulHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, España.
A Patiño-PatónHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, España.
G García-RibasHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, 28034 Madrid, España.
A Alonso-CánovasHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most patients with Parkinson's disease experience motor fluctuations or 'off' periods, which impact on their daily activities, increase their disability and diminish their quality of life. They suffer from these fluctuations despite multiple adjustments to the schedules, doses and intake of medication. In this context, on-demand or rescue treatments are necessary to attempt to improve 'off' periods, with drugs that have the pharmacokinetic advantage of a much faster onset of action because their routes of administration are not oral. There are currently three on-demand therapies for the treatment of fluctuations: subcutaneous apomorphine, inhaled levodopa and sublingual apomorphine. Of the three alternatives, subcutaneous apomorphine generally has the fastest onset of action, sublingual apomorphine provides the longest clinical effect, and inhaled levodopa has the most favourable side effect profile. Each of these drugs has its own characteristics: the time before onset of action, the duration of action and different side effect profiles. The choice for each patient will depend on their individual needs and circumstances. To mark the first year of the introduction of inhaled levodopa, we review these therapies, focusing on the experience with this new dosage form of levodopa.

Indexed as

Antiparkinson AgentsLevodopaParkinson DiseaseAdministration, InhalationApomorphineHumansAntiparkinson AgentsApomorphineLevodopa

Identifiers

PMID38916176
PMCPMC11513514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.