ArticleCureus2024
Comparison of Bond Strength Between Two Resin Cement Types and Additive Manufacturing or Cast Cobalt-Chromium Alloys.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Shear bond strength of laser-sintered orthodontic appliances bonded to enamel using various bonding protocols: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Shear bond strength evaluation of new computer-aided design - computer-aided manufacturing chromium-cobalt alloy (Sintron) with two different types of cement: An in vitro study.Dental research journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the bond strength of two types of resin cement to that of additive manufacturing (AM) or cast cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) alloys. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwo types of resin luting cement, composite resin and methyl methacrylate (MMA), were bonded to AM or cast Co-Cr alloys, and shear bond tests were performed after seven days of storage in distilled water at 37°C. Co-Cr alloy adhesive elements AM to the enamel surface of the labial aspect of a bovine mandibular central incisor crown were bonded with two types of resin luting cement and subjected to 1,000 cycles of storage in water for one day and 28 days or thermal cycling, followed by shear bonding tests. Residual cement on the metal and enamel surfaces after the bonding tests was evaluated using an optical microscope. The normality of the results was evaluated using statistical software Statcel4, analysis of variance, or Kruskal-Wallis test, depending on normality, and multiple comparison tests were performed using the Tukey-Kramer or Steel-Dwass tests.
resultsAfter one day, the shear bond strength (SBS) was 25.9 MPa for Panavia V5 (PV; Kuraray Noritake Dental Corporation, Niigata, Japan) and 23.5 MPa for Super-Bond (SB; Sun Medical Corporation, Shiga, Japan), with no significant difference between the two cement types (P > 0.05). After 28 days, the SBS decreased to 4.1 MPa for PV and 6.7 MPa for SB, showing a significant difference between the two cements (P < 0.05). Following 1,000 thermal cycles, the SBS was 2.0 MPa for PV and 5.6 MPa for SB, with SB exhibiting a significantly higher value (P < 0.05). The adhesive strength was significantly lower after 28 days of storage and thermal cycling compared to after one day of storage (P < 0.05). The Co-Cr alloy exhibited more residual cement on the enamel surface due to interfacial fracture with the resin cement. The Co-Cr alloy showed more residual cement on the enamel surface due to interfacial fracture with the resin cement.
conclusionMMA-based resin cement showed optimal bond strength and may be suitable for clinical use in computer-aided design (CAD)/computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) orthodontic appliances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.