ArticleCureus2024
Evaluation of Serological Tests for the Diagnosis of Syphilis.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Trend in Hospital-Wide Syphilis Testing and Clinical Characteristics of Syphilis Requiring Treatment.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- The Rise of Syphilis Infections and Reinfections over a Decade (2009-2019) in the Bolognese Area: A Retrospective Analysis.Microorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Syphilis remains a significant public health concern in India. Ensuring the accuracy of diagnostic tests is crucial for effectively managing this disease. Objectives This study aims to assess the detectability of syphilis using commercially available non-treponemal and treponemal tests due to observed discrepancies in test results, which can lead to confusion and anxiety among healthcare providers and patients. Materials and methods We analyzed 2312 serum samples using the rapid plasma reagin (RPR),
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.