Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38915984›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

A Comparison of Diagnostic and Immunohistochemical Workup and Literature Review Capabilities of Online Artificial Intelligence Assistance Models in Pathology.

Johnika Dougan, Netra Patel, Svetoslav Bardarov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johnika DouganPathology and Laboratory Medicine, St. George's University School of Medicine, St. George's, GRD.
Netra PatelPathology and Laboratory Medicine, American University of Antigua, Antigua, USA.
Svetoslav BardarovPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Richmond University Medical Center, Staten Island, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a suite of technologies that enables computers to learn and interpret information like human cognition. It has found applications across various fields, including healthcare, agriculture, astronomy, navigation, and robotics. Within healthcare, AI has the potential to enhance diagnostic accuracy, facilitate drug research, and automate patient experiences. This comparative study focuses on the proficiency of AI in generating accurate differential diagnoses in the field of pathology. Six medical vignettes were crafted, and each scenario was then input into three different AI platforms. The pathologist reviewed and determined the most accurate AI model.

Indexed as

ancillary studiesartificial intelligencecomparison studycomputer sciencedifferential diagnosessurgical pathology

Identifiers

PMID38915984
PMCPMC11196119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.