ReviewDEN open2025
Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in the USA: The current state and future perspectives.
Review in DEN open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transanal robotic versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for complex distal colorectal lesions: a comparative study.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Review
- Multitraction point strategy for endoscopic submucosal dissection in managing difficult colorectal lesions.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2026Article
- Comparison of Traction and Pocket Creation Methods for Facilitating Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Study on the application value of histogram parameters from reduced field-of-view VOI in rectal cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Outpatient endoscopic submucosal dissection for non-ampullary duodenal lesions: a single-center experience at a U.S. tertiary referral center.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Endoscopic submucosal dissection, transanal endoscopic microsurgical submucosal dissection, and transanal minimally invasive surgery in rectal lesions.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Traction Techniques for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection (ESD): Organ-Specific Best Practices and Western Outcomes.Current gastroenterology reports · 2025Review
- Evaluation of control strategies for robot-assisted multi-bending endoscope system (RAMBES).Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Negative Effect of Prior Lesion Manipulation on Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a transformative advancement in the endoscopic management of superficial gastrointestinal lesions. Initially conceived for the treatment of early gastric cancer, ESD has demonstrated proficiency in achieving en-bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal lesions. ESD has experienced widespread acceptance in Japan and East Asia; however, its adoption in the USA remains delayed. This initial hesitancy could be attributed to procedural complexity and training demands; nonetheless, recently, ESD has been gaining popularity in the USA. This is due to the advancements in endoscopic technology, tailored training programs, and cumulative evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of ESDs. This review aimed to deliberate the historical progress, current implementation, and prospective trajectory of ESDs in the USA. With ongoing clinical research, technological integration, and educational efforts, ESD is likely to become the gold standard for managing large gastrointesitinal lesions. This progress marks an imperative step toward less invasive, more precise, and patient-centric approaches regarding advanced therapeutic endoscopy in the USA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.