Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38915723›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

A new oculomotor model demystifies "Remarkable Saccades".

Heinen, Chandna, Singh, Watamaniuk

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Heinen
Chandna
Singh
Watamaniuk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hering's Law of binocular eye movement control guides most oculomotor research and supports diagnosis and treatment of clinical eye misalignment (strabismus). The law states that all eye movements are controlled by a unitary conjugate signal and a unitary vergence signal that sum. Recent evidence of temporally asynchronous inter-eye rotations during vergence (Chandna et al., 2021) challenges the viability of a unitary vergence signal. An alternative theory that might explain these anomalous results posits that the eyes are controlled independently. Yet independent control fails to explain a phenomenon known as "Remarkable Saccades" where an inappropriate saccade occurs from an eye aligned on a target during asymmetric vergence (Enright, 1992). We introduce a new model formulated to describe the Chandna et al. (2021) midline vergence result that generates remarkable saccades as an emergent property. The Hybrid Binocular Control model incorporates independent controllers for each eye with a cortical origin that interact with a unitary conjugate controller residing in brainstem. The model also accounts for behavioral variations in remarkable saccades when observers attend to an eye. Furthermore, it suggests more generally how the eyes are controlled during vergence and other voluntary eye movements, thus challenging documented oculomotor neural circuitry and suggesting that refinements are needed for clinical oculomotor interventions.

Identifiers

PMID38915723
PMCPMC11195182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.