ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Long-Read Structural and Epigenetic Profiling of a Kidney Tumor-Matched Sample with Nanopore Sequencing and Optical Genome Mapping.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carcinogenesis often involves significant alterations in the cancer genome architecture, marked by large structural and copy number variations (SVs and CNVs) that are difficult to capture with short-read sequencing. Traditionally, cytogenetic techniques are applied to detect such aberrations, but they are limited in resolution and do not cover features smaller than several hundred kilobases. Optical genome mapping and nanopore sequencing are attractive technologies that bridge this resolution gap and offer enhanced performance for cytogenetic applications. These methods profile native, individual DNA molecules, thus capturing epigenetic information. We applied both techniques to characterize a clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) tumor's structural and copy number landscape, highlighting the relative strengths of each method in the context of variant size and average read length. Additionally, we assessed their utility for methylome and hydroxymethylome profiling, emphasizing differences in epigenetic analysis applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.