ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Cellpose as a reliable method for single-cell segmentation of autofluorescence microscopy images.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Autofluorescence microscopy uses intrinsic sources of molecular contrast to provide cellular-level information without extrinsic labels. However, traditional cell segmentation tools are often optimized for high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) images, such as fluorescently labeled cells, and unsurprisingly perform poorly on low SNR autofluorescence images. Therefore, new cell segmentation tools are needed for autofluorescence microscopy. Cellpose is a deep learning network that is generalizable across diverse cell microscopy images and automatically segments single cells to improve throughput and reduce inter-human biases. This study aims to validate Cellpose for autofluorescence imaging, specifically from multiphoton intensity images of NAD(P)H. Manually segmented nuclear masks of NAD(P)H images were used to train new Cellpose models. These models were applied to PANC-1 cells treated with metabolic inhibitors and patient-derived cancer organoids (across 9 patients) treated with chemotherapies. These datasets include co-registered fluorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (FLIM) of NAD(P)H and FAD, so fluorescence decay parameters and the optical redox ratio (ORR) were compared between masks generated by the new Cellpose model and manual segmentation. The Dice score between repeated manually segmented masks was significantly lower than that of repeated Cellpose masks (p<0.0001) indicating greater reproducibility between Cellpose masks. There was also a high correlation (R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.