ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025
Adaptive Reinforcement Learning is causally supported by Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Striatum.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Learning the reward structure of complex environments can be achieved using reinforcement learning processes augmented with cognitive strategies. Among these strategies is the adjustment of the exploration-exploitation trade-off to increase exploration when behavior gets stuck and increase exploitation when reward contingencies remain stable. Here we tested how the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the striatum causally support adaptive cognitive strategies augmenting reinforcement learning. We electrically microstimulated the ACC or the striatum in nonhuman primates at the time they chose multidimensional objects to learn about their reward values, while varying target feature uncertainty and the motivational saliency of the chosen objects. We found that stimulation of the ACC and the striatum affected adaptive strategies and reinforcement learning when target feature uncertainty was high, but in opposite ways. ACC-stimulation impaired learning and sustaining correct responses, while striatum-stimulation on average improved learning from rewarding outcomes. Behavioral modeling showed that stimulation affected the same mechanisms but in opposite ways. ACC stimulation impaired the monitoring of outcome uncertainty for adapting exploration-exploitation and reduced the ability to lower prediction errors during learning, while striatum stimulation enhanced the monitoring of outcome uncertainty and prediction-error based updating of object values. Stimulation did not alter the use of working memory or attentional filtering as alternative learning strategy. These opposing behavioral stimulation effects were associated with the ACC having populations of neurons that fired stronger during choices that were more uncertain, had a lower value, and that tracked error history, while striatum neurons more likely encoded higher values and more certain choices. In summary, microstimulation during object choices suggest that ACC and the striatum causally adapt exploration-exploitation levels to guide exploration towards reward-relevant objects during periods of uncertainty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.