Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38915609›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Adaptive Reinforcement Learning is causally supported by Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Striatum.

Robert Louis Treuting, Kianoush Banaie Boroujeni, Charles Grimes Gerrity, Adam Neumann, Paul Tiesinga, Thilo Womelsdorf

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robert Louis TreutingDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240.ORCID 0000-0002-1485-0650
Kianoush Banaie BoroujeniDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240.ORCID 0000-0002-2323-0648
Charles Grimes GerrityDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240.
Adam NeumannDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240.
Paul TiesingaDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen 6525 EN, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4509-6870
Thilo WomelsdorfDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240.ORCID 0000-0001-6921-4187

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Learning Relevance in Multidimensional EnvironmentsR01MH123687 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WOMELSDORF, THILO · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123687
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Learning the reward structure of complex environments can be achieved using reinforcement learning processes augmented with cognitive strategies. Among these strategies is the adjustment of the exploration-exploitation trade-off to increase exploration when behavior gets stuck and increase exploitation when reward contingencies remain stable. Here we tested how the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the striatum causally support adaptive cognitive strategies augmenting reinforcement learning. We electrically microstimulated the ACC or the striatum in nonhuman primates at the time they chose multidimensional objects to learn about their reward values, while varying target feature uncertainty and the motivational saliency of the chosen objects. We found that stimulation of the ACC and the striatum affected adaptive strategies and reinforcement learning when target feature uncertainty was high, but in opposite ways. ACC-stimulation impaired learning and sustaining correct responses, while striatum-stimulation on average improved learning from rewarding outcomes. Behavioral modeling showed that stimulation affected the same mechanisms but in opposite ways. ACC stimulation impaired the monitoring of outcome uncertainty for adapting exploration-exploitation and reduced the ability to lower prediction errors during learning, while striatum stimulation enhanced the monitoring of outcome uncertainty and prediction-error based updating of object values. Stimulation did not alter the use of working memory or attentional filtering as alternative learning strategy. These opposing behavioral stimulation effects were associated with the ACC having populations of neurons that fired stronger during choices that were more uncertain, had a lower value, and that tracked error history, while striatum neurons more likely encoded higher values and more certain choices. In summary, microstimulation during object choices suggest that ACC and the striatum causally adapt exploration-exploitation levels to guide exploration towards reward-relevant objects during periods of uncertainty.

Indexed as

attentional controlCognitive flexibilitymotivationnonhuman primateprediction errortask difficultyworking memory

Identifiers

PMID38915609
PMCPMC11195175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.