ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Detection of latent brain states from baseline neural activity in the amygdala.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The amygdala responds to a large variety of socially and emotionally salient environmental and interoceptive stimuli. The context in which these stimuli occur determines their social and emotional significance. In canonical neurophysiological studies, the fast-paced succession of stimuli and events induce phasic changes in neural activity. During inter-trial intervals neural activity is expected to return to a stable and relatively featureless baseline. Context, such as the presence of a social partner, or the similarity of trials in a blocked design, induces brain states that can transcend the fast-paced succession of stimuli and can be recovered from the baseline firing rate of neurons. Indeed, the baseline firing rates of neurons in the amygdala change between blocks of trials of gentle grooming touch, delivered by a trusted social partner, and non-social airflow stimuli, delivered by a computer-controlled air valve. In this experimental paradigm, the presence of the groomer alone was sufficient to induce small but significant changes in baseline firing rates. Here, we examine local field potentials (LFP) recorded during these baseline periods to determine whether context was encoded by network dynamics that emerge in the local field potentials from the activity of large ensembles of neurons. We found that machine learning techniques can reliably decode social vs. non-social context from spectrograms of baseline local field potentials. Notably, decoding accuracy improved significantly with access to broad-band information. No significant differences were detected between the nuclei of the amygdala that receive direct or indirect inputs from areas of the prefrontal cortex known to coordinate flexible, context-dependent behaviors. The lack of nuclear specificity suggests that context-related synaptic inputs arise from a shared source, possibly interoceptive inputs that signal the sympathetic- vs. parasympathetic-dominated states characterizing non-social and social blocks, respectively.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.