Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38915401›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024

Clinician and administrator perspectives on outpatient administration of ciltacabtagene autoleucel in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma.

Doris K Hansen, Binod Dhakal, Mehdi Hamadani, David Dingli, Tania Jain, Carol Ann Huff, Murali Janakiram, Yi-Hsuan Liu, Kevin C De Braganca, Nicole Lodowski and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Doris K HansenDepartment of Blood and Marrow Transplant and Cellular Immunotherapy, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States.
Binod DhakalBlood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) and Cellular Therapy, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Mehdi HamadaniBlood and Marrow Transplant (BMT) and Cellular Therapy, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
David DingliDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Tania JainDivision of Hematological Malignancies and Bone Marrow Transplantation, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Carol Ann HuffDivision of Hematological Malignancies and Bone Marrow Transplantation, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Murali JanakiramDepartment of Hematology and Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States.
Yi-Hsuan LiuReal-World Value & Evidence, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson company, Horsham, PA, United States.
Kevin C De BragancaMedical Affairs, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson company, Raritan, NJ, United States.
Nicole LodowskiAvalere Health, New York, NY, United States.
Jennifer SanderAvalere Health, New York, NY, United States.
Peter OkorozoAvalere Health, New York, NY, United States.
Lindsay McFarlandLegend Biotech USA Inc., Somerset, NJ, United States.
Matthew PerciavalleLegend Biotech USA Inc., Somerset, NJ, United States.
Stephen HuoMedical Affairs, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson company, Raritan, NJ, United States.
Zaina P QureshiReal-World Value & Evidence, Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, a Johnson & Johnson company, Horsham, PA, United States.
Krina K PatelDepartment of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (CAR T therapy) is a treatment option for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma that has led to unprecedented treatment outcomes. Among CAR T therapies available, ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is a good candidate for outpatient administration due to its generally predictable safety profile. There are multiple advantages of outpatient administration of cilta-cel, including reduced healthcare burden, expanded access, and patient autonomy. This mixed methods qualitative study aimed to identify key factors for outpatient administration of CAR T and best practice recommendations by combining a targeted literature review with expert interviews and panels. Methods: The targeted review (Phase 1) aimed to identify factors for outpatient CAR T administration in the US and determine key topics for the exploratory interviews (Phase 2) and expert panels (Phase 3), which aimed to inform on best practices and challenges of outpatient CAR T administration (focusing on cilta-cel). Participants in clinical and administrative positions based in treatment centers that had experience with real-world outpatient administration of cilta-cel were recruited. Results: Seventeen studies were identified in Phase 1. Key factors for outpatient administration included the development of protocols for CAR T complications, education for caregivers, outpatient specialists, hospital staff, and emergency services staff for identification and referral after possible adverse events, the creation of multidisciplinary teams for effective communication and management, straightforward patient intake processes encompassing financial eligibility review and provision of patient education materials, and close patient monitoring throughout the treatment journey. In Phase 2, 5 participants from 2 centers were interviewed. In Phase 3, 14 participants across 6 treatment centers were interviewed. Two 90-minute virtual panel discussions took place. All participants agreed that cilta-cel can be safely and effectively administered in an outpatient setting. Key recommendations included the creation of educational resources for patients and caregivers, the development of standard operating procedures, dedicated outpatient infrastructure and establishment of interdisciplinary teams, outpatient monitoring for toxicity management, and monitoring of the reimbursement landscape. Discussion: This study offers a comprehensive understanding of the feasibility of outpatient cilta-cel administration in participating CAR T centers and provides actionable recommendations while acknowledging existing challenges.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveMultiple MyelomaAmbulatory CareBiological ProductsHumansMaleOutpatientsReceptors, Chimeric Antigenaxicabtagene ciloleucelBiological ProductsReceptors, Chimeric Antigenambulatory careCAR T-cellcar t therapyciltacabtagene autoleucelcilta-celmultiple myelomaoutpatientrelapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID38915401
PMCPMC11194690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.