ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Towards a survival risk prediction model for metastatic NSCLC patients on durvalumab using whole-lung CT radiomics.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A machine learning approach for multimodal data fusion for survival prediction in cancer patients.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Inflammation-associated drug resistance and tumor growth in TNBC.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Existing criteria for predicting patient survival from immunotherapy are primarily centered on the PD-L1 status of patients. We tested the hypothesis that noninvasively captured baseline whole-lung radiomics features from CT images, baseline clinical parameters, combined with advanced machine learning approaches, can help to build models of patient survival that compare favorably with PD-L1 status for predicting 'less-than-median-survival risk' in the metastatic NSCLC setting for patients on durvalumab. With a total of 1062 patients, inclusive of model training and validation, this is the largest such study yet. Methods: To ensure a sufficient sample size, we combined data from treatment arms of three metastatic NSCLC studies. About 80% of this data was used for model training, and the remainder was held-out for validation. We first trained two independent models; Model-C trained to predict survival using clinical data; and Model-R trained to predict survival using whole-lung radiomics features. Finally, we created Model-C+R which leveraged both clinical and radiomics features. Results: The classification accuracy (for median survival) of Model-C, Model-R, and Model-C+R was 63%, 55%, and 68% respectively. Sensitivity analysis of survival prediction across different training and validation cohorts showed concordance indices ([95 percentile]) of 0.64 ([0.63, 0.65]), 0.60 ([0.59, 0.60]), and 0.66 ([0.65,0.67]), respectively. We additionally evaluated generalization of these models on a comparable cohort of 144 patients from an independent study, demonstrating classification accuracies of 65%, 62%, and 72% respectively. Conclusion: Machine Learning models combining baseline whole-lung CT radiomic and clinical features may be a useful tool for patient selection in immunotherapy. Further validation through prospective studies is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.