ArticleHealth science reports2024
Prediction of wound healing status following dental extraction using Adapted-University of Connecticut osteonecrosis numerical scale: A retrospective study.
Article in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of unidirectional barbed knotless suture versus vicryl rapide suture for intraoral wound closure in maxillofacial trauma: A clinical study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Prediction of wound healing status following dental extraction using Adapted-University of Connecticut osteonecrosis numerical scale: A retrospective study.Health science reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: There is a scarcity of evidence concerning the use of a prognostic instrument for predicting normal healing, delayed healing, and medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) occurrence following tooth extraction in medically compromised patients. The present study aimed to predict healing outcomes following tooth extraction in medically compromised patients using an Adapted-University of Connecticut osteonecrosis numerical scale (A-UCONNS). Methods: The digital medical records of medically compromised patients were reviewed, who underwent tooth extraction. The A-UCONNS parameters included the initial pathological condition, dental procedures, comorbidities (smoking habits, type and duration of medication, and type of intervention), and administered antiresorptive (AR) medications. Each parameter was assigned a different weight, and the scores were then accumulated and classified into three categories: minimal risk (less than 10), moderate risk (10-15), and significant risk (16 or more). The patient's healing status was categorized as normal healing, delayed healing, or MRONJ. Results: A total of 353 male patients (mean age: 67.4 years) were recruited from a pool of 3977 patients, where 12.46% of patients had delayed wound healing, and 18.69% developed MRONJ. The median A-UCONNS scores for MRONJ were higher based on initial pathology, comorbidity, and AR drugs compared to normal or delayed healing. In addition, a significant relationship existed between A-UCONNS and healing outcomes ( Conclusion: The A-UCONNS could act as a promising tool for predicting wound healing outcomes. It can provide clinicians the ability to pinpoint patients at high risk and allow tailoring of patient-specific strategies for improving healing outcomes following tooth extraction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.